A code-based method for carbon emission prediction of 3D printing: A case study on the fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing and comparison with conventional approach

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Shujun [1 ]
Liu, Heng [1 ]
Zhao, Gang [2 ]
Zhang, Hua [3 ]
Hou, Feng [4 ,5 ]
Xu, Kuankuan [4 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430081, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Hubei Key Lab Mech Transmiss & Mfg Engn, Wuhan 430081, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Green Mfg Engn, Wuhan 430081, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Key Lab Met Equipment & Control Technol, Minist Educ, Wuhan 430081, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Deakin Univ, Sch Engn, Geelong, Vic 3216, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
3D printing technology; Injection molding; G code; Carbon emission prediction; Sustainability; Process parameters; LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; MACHINE-TOOLS; IRON; SUSTAINABILITY; OPTIMIZATION; SCALE; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144341
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study presents a method for predicting carbon emissions from 3D printing based on the G-code and compares the emissions between FDM and injection molding (IM) processes. Traditional manufacturing methods for (polylactic acid) PLA plastic products involve IM, which require extensive equipment and metal molds to be manufactured first. This process involves repetitive heating and machining, low material utilization, high energy consumption, and high pollution. 3D printing using a gradual accumulation of materials to manufacture parts has transformed traditional manufacturing methods. However, concerns regarding the environmental impact of 3D printing have been raised in previous studies. To achieve sustainability in 3D printing, it is important to make effective adjustments by predicting the carbon emissions before printing. In this study, we propose a method for predicting carbon emissions from 3D printing by integrating processing characteristics with G-code instructions. The deviation of the model was confirmed to be between 3.86% and 5.82% through a case study of FDM 3D printing. The optimal process parameters were determined from carbon emissions predictions, resulting in carbon emissions reductions of up to 43.77%. Carbon emissions were evaluated using both the traditional IM method and FDM 3D printing for manufacturing PLA plastic products. The results showed that the carbon emissions from FDM were significantly lower than those from traditional IM in small batches or customized production. In the traditional IM method, mold manufacturing produces high carbon emissions, accounting for more than 99% of the entire process. The findings of this study offer valuable guidance to manufacturers in selecting appropriate manufacturing methods and formulating production strategies. By predicting carbon emissions in the FDM process and adjusting the parameters based on product quality requirements, significant reductions in carbon emissions can be achieved during the production of small batches or customized PLA plastic products. The carbon emission prediction method proposed in this study presents a more sustainable solution for 3D printing technology, which is crucial for advancing sustainable production and environmental protection in this field.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fused deposition modelling (FDM) based 3D & 4D Printing: A state of art review
    Sharma, Ankit
    Rai, Aryan
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 62 : 367 - 372
  • [22] THERMOPLASTICS 3D PRINTING USING FUSED DEPOSITION MODELING ON FABRICS
    Blais, Maxwell
    Tomlinson, Scott
    Khoda, Bashir
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2021 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION (IMECE2021), VOL 3, 2021,
  • [23] Sustainable Materials for Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing Applications
    Rett, Jennifer P.
    Traore, Yannick L.
    Ho, Emmanuel A.
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS, 2021, 23 (07)
  • [24] Topology Optimization for Multipatch Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing
    Yu, Huangchao
    Hong, Huajie
    Cao, Su
    Ahmad, Rafiq
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [25] Iron–Paraffin Composite Material for 3D Printing by Fused Deposition Modeling Method
    V.P. Bondarenko
    O.V. Ievdokymova
    O.O. Matviichuk
    K.Ye. Kutakh
    M.O. Tsysar
    Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics, 2021, 59 : 730 - 738
  • [26] Durability of 3D Printed Concrete: A Comparison of Extrusion 3D Printing, Shotcrete 3D Printing and Conventional Casting
    Boehler, David
    Mai, Inka
    Lowke, Dirk
    FOURTH RILEM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCRETE AND DIGITAL FABRICATION, DC 2024, 2024, 53 : 283 - 290
  • [27] 3D printing of amorphous solid dispersions: A comparison of fused deposition modeling and drop-on-powder printing
    Gottschalk, Nadine
    Bogdahn, Malte
    Quodbach, Julian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS-X, 2023, 5
  • [28] Spatiotemporal G-code Modeling for Secure FDM-based 3D Printing
    Rais, Muhammad Haris
    Li, Ye
    Ahmed, Irfan
    ICCPS'21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ACM/IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS (WITH CPS-IOT WEEK 2021), 2021, : 177 - 186
  • [29] Influence of fused deposition method 3D printing on thermoelastic effect
    Park, Sang-Lok
    Hong, Gwang-Wook
    Kim, Jihyun
    Kim, Joo-Hyung
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 33 (11) : 5235 - 5241
  • [30] Influence of fused deposition method 3D printing on thermoelastic effect
    Sang-Lok Park
    Gwang-Wook Hong
    Jihyun Kim
    Joo-Hyung Kim
    Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2019, 33 : 5235 - 5241