Heterogeneous latent transfer learning in Gaussian graphical models

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Qiong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Chi [4 ,5 ]
Chen, Yong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Blockley Hall 602,423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Ctr Hlth AI & Synth Evidence CHASE, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Canc Biostat, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[5] Univ Kentucky, Dept Stat, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Gaussian graphical model; latent subpopulation; precision matrix; transfer learning; INVERSE COVARIANCE ESTIMATION; EXPRESSION; PHENOTYPE;
D O I
10.1093/biomtc/ujae096
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) are useful for understanding the complex relationships between biological entities. Transfer learning can improve the estimation of GGMs in a target dataset by incorporating relevant information from related source studies. However, biomedical research often involves intrinsic and latent heterogeneity within a study, such as heterogeneous subpopulations. This heterogeneity can make it difficult to identify informative source studies or lead to negative transfer if the source study is improperly used. To address this challenge, we developed a heterogeneous latent transfer learning (Latent-TL) approach that accounts for both within-sample and between-sample heterogeneity. The idea behind this approach is to "learn from the alike" by leveraging the similarities between source and target GGMs within each subpopulation. The Latent-TL algorithm simultaneously identifies common subpopulation structures among samples and facilitates the learning of target GGMs using source samples from the same subpopulation. Through extensive simulations and real data application, we have shown that the proposed method outperforms single-site learning and standard transfer learning that ignores the latent structures. We have also demonstrated the applicability of the proposed algorithm in characterizing gene co-expression networks in breast cancer patients, where the inferred genetic networks identified many biologically meaningful gene-gene interactions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Node-Based Learning of Multiple Gaussian Graphical Models
    Mohan, Karthik
    London, Palma
    Fazei, Maryan
    Witten, Daniela
    Lee, Su-In
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2014, 15 : 445 - 488
  • [32] Learning unfaithful k-separable Gaussian graphical models
    Soh, De Wen
    Tatikonda, Sekhar
    Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2019, 20
  • [33] Reproducible Learning of Gaussian Graphical Models via Graphical Lasso Multiple Data Splitting
    Hu, Kang
    Li, Danning
    Liu, Binghui
    ACTA MATHEMATICA SINICA-ENGLISH SERIES, 2025, 41 (02) : 553 - 568
  • [34] Reproducible Learning of Gaussian Graphical Models via Graphical Lasso Multiple Data Splitting
    Kang Hu
    Danning Li
    Binghui Liu
    Acta Mathematica Sinica,English Series, 2025, (02) : 553 - 568
  • [35] Using Bayesian Latent Gaussian Graphical Models to Infer Symptom Associations in Verbal Autopsies
    Li, Zehang Richard
    McComick, Tyler H.
    Clark, Samuel J.
    BAYESIAN ANALYSIS, 2020, 15 (03): : 781 - 807
  • [36] On perfectness in Gaussian graphical models
    Amini, Arash A.
    Aragam, Bryon
    Zhou, Qing
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 151, 2022, 151
  • [37] Tests for Gaussian graphical models
    Verzelen, N.
    Villers, F.
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2009, 53 (05) : 1894 - 1905
  • [38] Stratified Gaussian graphical models
    Nyman, Henrik
    Pensar, Johan
    Corander, Jukka
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2017, 46 (11) : 5556 - 5578
  • [39] On skewed Gaussian graphical models
    Sheng, Tianhong
    Li, Bing
    Solea, Eftychia
    JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2023, 194
  • [40] Positivity for Gaussian graphical models
    Draisma, Jan
    Sullivant, Seth
    Talaska, Kelli
    ADVANCES IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2013, 50 (05) : 661 - 674