Optimizing Soil Characterization with Automated Pressuremeter Software Integration for the Pencel Pressuremeter in In-situ Testing

被引:0
|
作者
Messaoud F. [1 ]
Nouaouria M.S. [1 ]
Cosentino P.J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Laboratory of Civil Engineering and Hydraulic, University 8 Mai 1945, Guelma
[2] Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL
来源
Geotechnical Engineering | 2024年 / 55卷 / 02期
关键词
Data Accuracy; Pencel Pressuremeter; Sensors Integration; Soil Characterization; Stabilization Time;
D O I
10.14456/seagj.2024.11
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The integration of the Pencel Pressuremeter (PPMT) model with the Automated Pressuremeter (APMT) software represents a significant advancement in in-situ soil testing. This combination simplifies the process of data reduction and analysis, resulting in substantial time savings. The APMT software efficiently records digital pressure and volume data, performs necessary calibrations, and offers quick access to essential strength and stiffness properties for engineering analysis. Through extensive testing conducted on various soil types, the integration of a linear potentiometer and a digital pressure transducer into the control unit has significantly improved the accuracy of digital volume measurements and pressure readings. Notably, the Stabilization Time (ST) for volume increments, as estimated by the APMT software, ranges from 20 to 70 seconds depending on the specific soil conditions. The APMT system not only enhances data quality but also minimizes the potential for human recording errors. It drastically reduces the time required for data collection and analysis when compared to manual methods, establishing itself as an efficient and precise tool for evaluating soil properties. © 2024, Southeast Asian Geotechnical Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 25
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improved 3D characterization of in-situ soil desiccation cracking by multi-source data integration
    Zhang, Jun-Zheng
    Tang, Chao-Sheng
    Mu, Wen
    Xu, Jin-Jian
    Zhou, Qi-You
    Shi, Bin
    Geoderma, 2024, 449
  • [32] Characterization of wrinkle recovery of fabrics based on in-situ mechanical testing
    Hu X.
    Sun F.
    Xiao C.
    Gao W.
    Fangzhi Xuebao/Journal of Textile Research, 2020, 41 (10): : 41 - 45
  • [33] In-situ soil characterization using vision cone penetrometer (VisCPT)
    Hryciw, RD
    Ghalib, AM
    Raschke, SA
    GEOTECHNICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 1081 - 1086
  • [34] In-situ characterization of soil moisture content using a monopole probe
    Sagnard, F. M.
    Guilbert, V.
    Fauchard, C.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2009, 68 (02) : 182 - 193
  • [35] Calculation, Model Testing and In-Situ Measurements of Tunnels in Soft Soil.
    Mueller-Salzburg, L.
    Sauer, G.
    Chambosse, G.
    Bauingenieur, 1977, 52 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [36] In-situ consolidation of thermoplastic composites by automated fiber placement: Characterization of defects
    Fereidouni, Mahmoud
    Hoa, Suong Van
    JOURNAL OF THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2025, 38 (02) : 471 - 511
  • [37] Integration of a SAW sensor system into penetration cones for in-situ soil gas analysis
    Skrypnik, Aleksandr
    Voigt, Achim
    Rapp, Michael
    2006 IEEE SENSORS, VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 1381 - +
  • [38] The relevance of in-situ and laboratory characterization of sandy soil hydraulic properties for soil water simulations
    Rezaei, Meisam
    Seuntjens, Piet
    Shahidi, Reihaneh
    Joris, Ingeborg
    Boenne, Wesley
    Al-Barri, Bashar
    Cornelis, Wim
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 534 : 251 - 265
  • [39] Characterization of a saprolitic soil from Porto granite by in situ testing
    da Fonseca, AV
    Fernandes, MM
    Cardoso, AS
    GEOTECHNICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 1381 - 1387
  • [40] A Brief Survey of Current Software Engineering Practices in Continuous Integration and Automated Accessibility Testing
    Sane, Parth
    2021 SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, SIGNAL PROCESSING AND NETWORKING (WISPNET), 2021, : 130 - 134