Selecting case tools: A decision model

被引:0
|
作者
Rojas, T.
Perez, M.
Griman, A.
Ortega, M.
Diaz, A.
机构
来源
Revista de la Facultad de Ingenieria | 2000年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Given the diversity of factors affecting the adoption of a CASE tool, their complexity, by way of the amount of components offered, the strategic importance for organizations of a timely, correct selection of tools, it is of utmost importance to support said selection process. This paper thus proposes a Decision Model which will increase the efficiency and effectiveness of this process and guarantee its completeness. The evaluation method for CASE tools included a set of activities that can be grouped into three major steps: selection and acquisition of CASE tools. development and application of the Decision Model and Analysis of Results. The algorithm supporting the Decision Model used in this research is formed by six finite sequential steps, by means of which a group of CASE tools meeting the case study requirements is obtained. This algorithm provides a quantitative way of comparing different CASE tools and aids the decision-maker, who in this case is the person requiring the tool to support his software development processes. The Decision Model allows the decision-maker to select CASE tools according to different Technological factors. These factors were grouped into two categories: internal and external, the first referring to factors related to the architecture and internal structure of the tools and concentrating on what the tool (isolated from its context) can offer. These in turn were classified based on two criteria: the scope - what the tool encompasses - and the design - what the tool is like. The external categories refer to supplementary factors in the tool environment. Their criteria being support and the solidity of the developing company.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 144
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical Decision Support Tools for Selecting Interventions for Patients with Disabling Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Scoping Review
    Gross, Douglas P.
    Armijo-Olivo, Susan
    Shaw, William S.
    Williams-Whitt, Kelly
    Shaw, Nicola T.
    Hartvigsen, Jan
    Qin, Ziling
    Ha, Christine
    Woodhouse, Linda J.
    Steenstra, Ivan A.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2016, 26 (03) : 286 - 318
  • [42] Clinical Decision Support Tools for Selecting Interventions for Patients with Disabling Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Scoping Review
    Douglas P. Gross
    Susan Armijo-Olivo
    William S. Shaw
    Kelly Williams-Whitt
    Nicola T. Shaw
    Jan Hartvigsen
    Ziling Qin
    Christine Ha
    Linda J. Woodhouse
    Ivan A. Steenstra
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2016, 26 : 286 - 318
  • [43] Selecting management tools wisely
    Rigby, Darrell
    Bilodeau, Barbara
    HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 2007, 85 (12) : 20 - 22
  • [44] EVALUATING AND SELECTING TESTING TOOLS
    POSTON, RM
    SEXTON, MP
    IEEE SOFTWARE, 1992, 9 (03) : 33 - 42
  • [45] On Selecting Collaborative Modeling Tools
    Sammapun, Usa
    Bunyakiati, Panuchart
    2018 IEEE 42ND ANNUAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (COMPSAC), VOL 1, 2018, : 791 - 792
  • [46] Decision tools for selecting industrial sites where a systematic blood lead screening should be implemented
    Glorennec, P
    Ledrans, M
    Fabres, B
    REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2006, 54 (02): : 117 - 125
  • [47] Selecting optimal hedging tools
    Duangploy, O
    deKorvin, A
    Hashemi, S
    Quirchmayr, G
    CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD WORLD CONGRESS ON EXPERT SYSTEMS, VOLS I AND II, 1996, : 139 - 146
  • [48] DECISION AIDING TOOLS IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: A CASE STUDY
    Montagna, F.
    Vittone, R.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE - DESIGN 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, (48): : 1181 - +
  • [49] TOOLS OF TRADE IN POLICY DECISION - PPBS, A CASE IN POINT
    LORD, WB
    SMITH, SC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1969, 51 (05) : 1427 - &
  • [50] Parent decision-making when selecting schools: The case of Nepal
    Joshi P.
    PROSPECTS, 2014, 44 (3) : 411 - 428