An agenda for technology assessment in the field of materials was developed through a process of dialogue among experts by use of a procedure known as a ″science forum″ . Materials scientists and technologists formed one group of experts, and social scientists formed another group. A scenario of a ″constrained economy″ provided a background for the forecast of science and technology for the remainder of this century. From this forecast, ″candidates for technology assessment″ were proposed and were rated as to urgency by both groups of experts. Two statistical procedures were used to estimate the degree of urgency for technology assessment (TA), as seen by each group of experts. An impressive degree of correlation was found between the ratings of the two groups and between the ranks as measured by the two statistical procedures.
机构:
Univ of Birmingham, Dep of, Transportation & Highway, Engineering, Birmingham, Engl, Univ of Birmingham, Dep of Transportation & Highway Engineering, Birmingham, EnglUniv of Birmingham, Dep of, Transportation & Highway, Engineering, Birmingham, Engl, Univ of Birmingham, Dep of Transportation & Highway Engineering, Birmingham, Engl
Snaith, M.S.
Burrow, J.C.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ of Birmingham, Dep of, Transportation & Highway, Engineering, Birmingham, Engl, Univ of Birmingham, Dep of Transportation & Highway Engineering, Birmingham, EnglUniv of Birmingham, Dep of, Transportation & Highway, Engineering, Birmingham, Engl, Univ of Birmingham, Dep of Transportation & Highway Engineering, Birmingham, Engl