Understanding continuous participation of customers in online co-innovation community

被引:0
|
作者
Li J. [1 ]
Liphong T. [1 ]
Qin Y. [1 ]
Gu Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Economic and Management, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin
关键词
Co-innovation; Continuous participation; Customer; Online community;
D O I
10.18280/ijsdp.150617
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Online co-innovation community is booming in the age of the Internet. After accessing the community, customers can share their ideas and opinions, and work together with brand designers. The initial adoption of participation in co-innovation community has been discussed by many scholars. However, there is little report on the post-adoptive intentions and behaviors of customers. To make up for the gap, this paper extends the technology acceptance model (TAM) with two dimensions, namely, community atmosphere and prior experience (including perceived positive feedback and degree of participation), and relies on the extended model to predict the customer attitude and intention to/for continuous participation in Xiaomi online innovation community. The results show that the attitude to continuous participation is a good predictor of the intention for continuous participation; community atmosphere and perceived usefulness have a significant effect on the attitude to continuous participation; perceived ease of use does not have a significant effect on the attitude to continuous participation; both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are affected by perceived positive feedback; the degree of participation has a great impact on perceived ease of use, but not on perceived usefulness. The research findings lay a solid foundation for further research into the continuous behaviors in online co-innovation communities. © 2020 WITPress. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 936
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Customer disposition to social exchange in Co-innovation
    Busser, James A.
    Shulga, Lenna V.
    Kang, Hee Jung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 76 : 299 - 307
  • [22] Digital Ecosystems and SEED Co-Innovation in Education
    Karduck, Achim P.
    2013 7TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL ECOSYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (DEST), 2013, : 31 - 36
  • [23] From innovation to co-innovation? An exploration of African agrifood chains
    Bitzer, Verena
    Bijman, Jos
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2015, 117 (08): : 2182 - 2199
  • [24] Gaming innovation ecosystem: actors, roles and co-innovation processes
    Patrycja Klimas
    Wojciech Czakon
    Review of Managerial Science, 2022, 16 : 2213 - 2259
  • [25] Perceived Individual Risk of Co-innovation in Collaborative Innovation Networks
    Abhari, Kaveh
    Davidson, Elizabeth J.
    Xiao, Bo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 50TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2017, : 873 - 882
  • [26] Digital disruption of optimal co-innovation configurations
    Lafuente, Esteban
    Vaillant, Yancy
    Rabetino, Rodrigo
    TECHNOVATION, 2023, 125
  • [27] Co-innovation to increase community resilience: influencing irrigation efficiency in the Waimakariri Irrigation Scheme
    Fielke, Simon J.
    Srinivasan, M. S.
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (01) : 255 - 267
  • [28] Co-innovation in a service oriented strategic network
    Arndt, Jens-Magnus
    Dibbern, Jens
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICES COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 285 - +
  • [29] MNE–SME co-innovation in peripheral regions
    Shameen Prashantham
    Sumelika Bhattacharyya
    Journal of International Business Policy, 2020, 3 : 134 - 153
  • [30] Value Systems Management Model for Co-innovation
    Macedo, Patricia
    Camarinha-Matos, Luis M.
    TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 349 : 11 - 20