Fuel performance code to code comparative analysis for the OECD/NEA MPCMIV benchmark

被引:0
|
作者
Faure, Quentin [1 ]
Delipei, Gregory [1 ]
Scolaro, Alessandro [2 ]
Avramova, Maria [1 ]
Ivanov, Kostadin [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Nucl Engn, 2500 Stinson Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne EPFL Route Cantonale, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Fuel performance; FAST; OFFBEAT; BISON; Pellet Cladding Mechanical Interaction (PCMI);
D O I
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113685
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The recently developed Multi-Physics Pellet Cladding Mechanical Interaction Validation (MPCMIV) benchmark includes dedicated transient fuel performance exercises. In this work, three fuel performance codes (BISON, OFFBEAT, FAST) are used to perform supporting studies for the benchmark. The exercises consist of a three-year long base irradiation of a father rod in a boiling water reactor followed by a cold ramp transient for a fuel rodlet refabricated from the father rod. For the base irradiation, the results obtained are satisfactory in comparison to the measurements, with some discrepancies observed in the cladding outer diameter for OFFBEAT and BISON, which can be explained by the oxidation models implemented in both codes. Concerning the cold ramp, which consists of a very fast power increase with the linear heat rate going from zero to its maximal value in just a few seconds, all the codes tend to underpredict the cladding axial elongation temporal evolution. The observed discrepancies between predictions and measurements are both in the maximal amplitude and shape of the cladding axial elongation temporal evolution. This suggests that the phenomenology is not predicted accurately. Using a multi-physics coupling (Griffin, BISON, THM), involving reactor-physics, thermal-hydraulic, and fuel performance, the ramp is investigated and an estimation of the LHR is obtained. The OFFBEAT model is then updated with the new LHR. The cladding axial elongation is predicted with significant better agreement compared to the measurements. In single physics fuel performance modeling, the linear heat rate is obtained by calorimetric technique, which is not suited for fast transient, while in the multi-physics model, the linear heat rate is predicted instead by the multi-physics model and then is used as a source term in the fuel performance code. Analyzing further the obtained results, plastic strains mainly axially and with an amplitude one order of magnitude lower than the total strain at peak transient are observed on a small part of the cladding. Future work will focus on improving the BISON model by implementing frictional contact and to use the model for more multi-physics studies as well.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The development of TRIAC-BATAN: a triso fuel performance analysis code
    Waskita, A. A.
    Setiadipura, T.
    SYMPOSIUM OF EMERGING NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING NOVELTY (SENTEN 2018), 2019, 1198
  • [42] PCI analysis of a commercial PWR using BISON fuel performance code
    Capps, Nathan
    Kennard, Michael
    Liu, Wenfeng
    Wirth, Brian D.
    Rashid, Joe
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2017, 324 : 131 - 142
  • [43] FUAS: An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis toolkit for fuel rod performance code
    Wei, Jun
    Wang, Yang
    Song, Zi-Fan
    Wang, Jie
    Liu, Xin
    Deng, Yong-Jun
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2022, 173
  • [44] RELAP5-3D ANALYSIS OF OECD-NEA/NRC BFBT BENCHMARK
    Kovtonyuk, Andriy
    Petruzzi, Alessandro
    Parisi, Carlo
    D'Auria, Francesco
    ICONE16: PROCEEDING OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING - 2008, VOL 3, 2008, : 849 - 857
  • [45] DEVELOPMENT OF THE SESAME METALLIC FUEL PERFORMANCE CODE
    KOBAYASHI, T
    KINOSHITA, M
    HATTORI, S
    OGAWA, T
    TSUBOI, Y
    ISHIDA, M
    OGAWA, S
    SAITO, H
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 89 (02) : 183 - 193
  • [46] Modeling of the Gadolinium Fuel Tests with the Jasmine Fuel Performance Code
    Wei, Xiaoyan
    Zhu, Yanan
    Yang, Shengzhi
    Xu, Duoting
    Jin, Xin
    Springer Proceedings in Physics, 2024, 299 : 340 - 353
  • [47] Analysis of NEA-NSC PWR Uncontrolled Control Rod Withdrawal at Zero Power Benchmark Cases with NODAL3 Code
    Sembiring, Tagor Malem
    Pinem, Surian
    Liem, Peng Hong
    SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS, 2017, 2017
  • [48] Coupled simulation for pin-wise reactor core analysis using subchannel analysis code CUPID and fuel performance code GIFT
    Lee, Yeong Hun
    Park, Jangkeun
    Choi, Youyeon
    Sim, Kyuseok
    Lee, Youho
    Cho, Hyoung Kyu
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2025, 213
  • [49] Comparative Code Structure Analysis using Deep Learning for Performance Prediction
    Ramadan, Tarek
    Islam, Tanzima Z.
    Phelps, Chase
    Pinnow, Nathan
    Thiagarajan, Jayaraman J.
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE (ISPASS 2021), 2021, : 151 - 161
  • [50] The 'Fuel Rod Analysis ToolBox': A general program for preparing the input of a fuel rod performance code
    Lassmann, K.
    Schubert, A.
    van de Laar, J.
    Van Uffelen, P.
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2015, 81 : 332 - 335