Evaluation of Neural Network Verification Methods for Air-to-Air Collision Avoidance

被引:6
|
作者
Lopez D.M. [1 ]
Johnson T.T. [1 ]
Bak S. [2 ]
Tran H.-D. [3 ]
Hobbs K.L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt University, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1025 16th Avenue South, Suite 102, Nashville, 37235, TN
[2] Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, 11794, NY
[3] University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, 68588, NE
[4] U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory, 2210 8th Street, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 45433, OH
来源
Journal of Air Transportation | 2023年 / 31卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Air-to-air collisions - Airborne collision avoidance systems - Closed-loop - Collisions avoidance - Neural network control - Neural-network approximations - Neural-networks - Open-loop - Verification method - Verification tools;
D O I
10.2514/1.D0255
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Neural network approximations have become attractive to compress data for automation and autonomy algorithms for use on storage-limited and processing-limited aerospace hardware. However, unless these neural network approximations can be exhaustively verified to be safe, they cannot be certified for use on aircraft. An example of such systems is the unmanned Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS) Xu, which is a very popular benchmark for open-loop neural network control system verification tools. This paper proposes a new closed-loop extension of this benchmark, which consists of a set of 10 closed-loop properties selected to evaluate the safety of an ownship aircraft in the presence of a co-altitude intruder aircraft. These closed-loop safety properties are used to evaluate five of the 45 neural networks that comprise the ACAS Xu benchmark (corresponding to co-altitude cases) as well as the switching logic between the five neural networks. The combination of nonlinear dynamics and switching between five neural networks is a challenging verification task accomplished with star-set reachability methods in two verification tools. The safety of the ownship aircraft under initial position uncertainty is guaranteed in every scenario proposed. © 2022 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of a real-time simulation environment for helicopter air-to-air refuelling investigations
    Schmidt, S. O.
    Jones, M.
    Loechert, P.
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 127 (1311): : 754 - 772
  • [32] Air-to-Air Visual Detection of Micro-UAVs: An Experimental Evaluation of Deep Learning
    Zheng, Ye
    Chen, Zhang
    Lv, Dailin
    Li, Zhixing
    Lan, Zhenzhong
    Zhao, Shiyu
    IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS, 2021, 6 (02): : 1020 - 1027
  • [33] Applying Model Checking Approach with Floating Point Arithmetic for Verification of Air Collision Avoidance Maneuver Hybrid Model
    Staroletov, Sergey
    Shilov, Nikolay
    MODEL CHECKING SOFTWARE, SPIN 2019, 2019, 11636 : 193 - 207
  • [34] Verifying an Aircraft Collision Avoidance Neural Network with Marabou
    Liu, Cong
    Cofer, Darren
    Osipychev, Denis
    NASA FORMAL METHODS, NFM 2023, 2023, 13903 : 79 - 85
  • [35] Towards Verification of Neural Networks for Small Unmanned Aircraft Collision Avoidance
    Irfan, Ahmed
    Julian, Kyle D.
    Wu, Haoze
    Barrett, Clark
    Kochenderfer, Mykel J.
    Meng, Baoluo
    Lopez, James
    2020 AIAA/IEEE 39TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC) PROCEEDINGS, 2020,
  • [36] The optimal control of collision avoidance trajectories In air traffic management
    Clements, JC
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1999, 33 (04) : 265 - 280
  • [37] Probabilistic Noncooperative Near Mid-Air Collision Avoidance
    Nordlund, Per-Johan
    Gustafsson, Fredrik
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2011, 47 (02) : 1265 - 1276
  • [38] Doing the Right Thing: Collision Avoidance for Autonomous Air Vehicles
    Mishra, Chinmay
    Mehta, Mitul
    Griffith, Elias J.
    Ralph, Jason F.
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2013), 2013, : 2581 - 2586
  • [39] Model predictive control approach to global air collision avoidance
    Bousson, K.
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 80 (06): : 605 - 612
  • [40] AIRBORNE COLLISION AVOIDANCE AND FAILURE OF AIR-TRAFFIC CONTROL
    RATCLIFF.S
    JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION, 1973, 26 (04): : 508 - 509