Effects of habitat fragmentation on ecosystem services and their trade-offs in Southwest China: A multi-perspective analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Li, Weijie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kang, Jinwen [1 ]
Wang, Yong [4 ]
机构
[1] China West Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[2] China West Normal Univ, Sichuan Prov Engn Lab Monitoring & Control Soil Er, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[3] China West Normal Univ, Inst Jialing River Basin, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[4] Southwest Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Chongqing Key Lab Karst Environm, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
关键词
Habitat fragmentation; Ecosystem services; Trade-offs; Multi-perspective analysis; Southwest China; MULTIFUNCTIONAL LANDSCAPES; IDENTIFICATION; REGION; COVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112699
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Exploring the relationships between habitat fragmentation on ecosystem services (ESs) is important for ecological conservation and spatial pattern optimisation. However, analyzing the influence of different habitat fragmentation processes on ESs and their trade-offs from a multiple perspective is still relatively lacking. Therefore, taking Southwest (SW) China as an example, this paper evaluated the dynamics and trade-off relationship of four main types of ESs (i.e., carbon storage (CS), grain production (GP), water retention (WR), soil retention (SR)) during 2000-2020, and analyzed the effects of four habitat fragmentation processes (i.e., decreasing habitat area, increasing habitat density, increasing habitat shape complexity and decreasing habitat cohesion) on ESs and their trade-offs by using geographically and temporally weighted regression model. The results showed that ESs showed a deterioration trend during 2000-2020, with GP, WR, CS, SR, and total ecosystem services (TES) declined by 66.45 %, 54.33 %, 41.68 %, 76.25 % and 65.83 %, respectively. The GP-SR, GP-CS and GP-WR pairs exhibited trade-offs, while other ES types pairs exhibited synergies with each other. Increasing habitat density and increasing in habitat shape complexity were the two strongest fragmentation processes influencing ESs and their trade-offs. The effects of various habitat fragmentation processes on ESs and their trade-offs have obvious spatial heterogeneity. With changes in terrain relief, proportion of karst area, habitat quality, and urbanization level, the association of habitat fragmentation-ESs and habitat fragmentationESs trade-offs existed different sensitivities. The results can provide effective guidance for landscape planning and ecosystem management in the SW.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in karst multi-mountainous cities
    Li, Qin
    Bao, Yu
    Wang, Zhitai
    Chen, Xintong
    Lin, Xun
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 159
  • [22] Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services
    Rodriguez, Jon Paul
    Beard, T. Douglas, Jr.
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Cork, Steven J.
    Agard, John
    Dobson, Andrew P.
    Peterson, Garry D.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2006, 11 (01):
  • [23] A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services
    Cavender-Bares, Jeannine
    Polasky, Stephen
    King, Elizabeth
    Balvanera, Patricia
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [24] Trade-offs in the provisioning and stability of ecosystem services in agroecosystems
    Montoya, Daniel
    Haegeman, Bart
    Gaba, Sabrina
    De Mazancourt, Claire
    Bretagnolle, Vincent
    Loreau, Michel
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2019, 29 (02)
  • [25] Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services in a Mountain Region
    Briner, Simon
    Huber, Robert
    Bebi, Peter
    Elkin, Che
    Schmatz, Dirk R.
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (03):
  • [26] Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation Trade-offs and Governance
    Bonacci, Ognjen
    HRVATSKE VODE, 2019, 27 (107) : 77 - 78
  • [27] ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FOR HUMAN WELLBEING Trade-offs and governance
    Mace, Georgina
    Schreckenberg, Kate
    Poudyal, Mahesh
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION: TRADE-OFFS AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, : 305 - 316
  • [28] Land use trade-offs in China?s protected areas from the perspective of accounting values of ecosystem services
    Chen, Haojie
    Costanza, Robert
    Kubiszewski, Ida
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 315
  • [29] Exploring the scale effects, trade-offs and driving forces of the mismatch of ecosystem services
    Sun, Wei
    Li, Dehuan
    Wang, Xiangrong
    Li, Rongxi
    Li, Kun
    Xie, Yujing
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 103 : 617 - 629
  • [30] Generalized Additive Model Reveals Nonlinear Trade-Offs/Synergies between Relationships of Ecosystem Services for Mountainous Areas of Southwest China
    Huang, Qi
    Peng, Li
    Huang, Kexin
    Deng, Wei
    Liu, Ying
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (12)