Reliability-based capacity safety factor for G20Mn5 cast steel joints

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Xianzhong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Chen [1 ]
Yan, Shen [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Xiaonong [1 ]
Zhang, Hao [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] State Key Lab Disaster Reduct Civil Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Civil Engn, Sydney, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cast steel joints; Safety factor; Reliability analysis; Uncertainty in fracture; Model uncertainty;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119237
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Cast steel joints have complex geometries and great load-carrying capacity, and hence their resistances are commonly determined through FE simulations. Considering the significant variability in the material mechanical properties (that in fracture strains, in particular) and the model uncertainty inevitably involved in the FE analysis, a large safety factor (gamma R) should be adopted for the FE simulation-based design of cast steel joints. However, the gamma R-values specified by the current design specifications, e.g. the Chinese standard CECS 235: 2008 in which gamma R = 3.0, are deemed to be overly conservative. This paper examined the structural reliability of G20Mn5 cast steel joints to provide a rational gamma R-value for the practical joint design. The above-mentioned uncertainty of the material and geometric properties as well as the model uncertainty related to FE simulations are evaluated, and Monte Carlo simulations were conducted on nine representative joints to obtain the statistical characteristics of cast steel joints' ultimate resistance, allowing for both failure modes of material fracture and instability caused by large-scale yielding. FORM was adopted to calculate the reliability index beta for the assumed gamma R-values and different loading scenarios, and the recommended values for gamma R under target reliability indices are proposed. For snow load-dominant and wind load-dominant load combinations, the recommended gamma R corresponding to beta = 4.2 are 2.29 and 2.16, respectively, and the recommended gamma R corresponding to beta = 3.7 are 2.01 and 1.90, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of the reliability-based and safety factor methods for structural design
    Wang, Xiaojun
    Shi, Qinghe
    Fan, Weichao
    Wang, Ruixing
    Wang, Lei
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2019, 72 : 68 - 84
  • [22] Reliability-Based Calibration of Fatigue Safety Factors for Existing Steel Bridges
    Leander, John
    Norlin, Bert
    Karoumi, Raid
    JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2015, 20 (10)
  • [23] Calibration and verification of cyclic void growth model for G20Mn5QT cast steel
    Yin, Yue
    Li, Shuai
    Han, Qinghua
    Lei, Peng
    ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2019, 206 : 310 - 329
  • [24] Effects of Temperature Drop on Ultralow Cycle Fatigue of G20Mn5QT Cast Steel
    Yin, Yue
    Xin, Jiaquan
    Zhang, Yunqi
    Lu, Yan
    Xu, Lisen
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2024, 36 (03)
  • [25] EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH PROPERTIES OF G20MN5QT CAST STEEL
    Xu, Jie
    Xu, Yantao
    Han, Qinhua
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STEEL AND ALUMINIUM STRUCTURES (ICSAS19), 2019, : 457 - 462
  • [26] RELIABILITY-BASED DERIVATION OF PARTIAL SAFETY FACTOR FOR STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT
    Pan, Shuo
    Zhao, Jianping
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE - 2008, VOL 6, PT A AND B, 2009, : 111 - 116
  • [27] G20Mn5悬索桥索夹用铸钢调质性能研究
    苏兰
    石红昌
    黄安明
    陈龙
    大型铸锻件, 2022, (03) : 44 - 47
  • [28] Fatigue behaviour of G20Mn5QT cast steel and butt welds with Q345B steel
    Qinghua Han
    Qi Guo
    Yue Yin
    Ying Xing
    International Journal of Steel Structures, 2016, 16 : 139 - 149
  • [29] Fatigue behaviour of G20Mn5QT cast steel and butt welds with Q345B steel
    Han, Qinghua
    Guo, Qi
    Yin, Yue
    Xing, Ying
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEEL STRUCTURES, 2016, 16 (01) : 139 - 149
  • [30] 某综合楼采光顶G20Mn5铸钢节点受力性能分析
    谢坚
    李运军
    董哲武
    朱玉林
    凌进
    孙水林
    山西建筑, 2022, 48 (07) : 41 - 45