An investigation of technology trust and habit in IT use continuance: a study of a social network

被引:11
|
作者
Ambalov I.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Science and Technology, Assumption University, Bangkok
关键词
Habit; Hedonic motivation; Intention; IT continuance; Social network; Trust in technology;
D O I
10.1108/JSIT-05-2019-0096
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Social networking services/systems (SNSs) have grown in popularity in the past decade. However, while some have been abandoned by their once loyal users, others have grown in popularity. Literature provides diverse and often conflicting justifications for this phenomenon. Seeking a credible explanation, this study aims to examine the roles of system-like trust and habit in SNS use continuance. Design/methodology/approach: This study conducted a comprehensive review of related literature to formulate an extended model of information technology (IT) continuance. A cross-sectional field survey was used to collect data from 401 university-student Facebook users. The research model was evaluated using structural equation modeling. Findings: The results indicate that trust in technology and hedonic motivation are important to direct influences on end-user continuance intention (CI), while habit is not. Interestingly, the most salient (indirect) predictor of CI is confirmation of (user) expectations. Practical implications: The study suggests a set of practical steps that managers and practitioners can undertake to support users’ decisions to continue using the systems. Originality/value: This paper advances IT continuance research by theorizing that trust in technology along with habit and hedonic motivation positively influence CI. In addition, the study enhances the concept of perceived usefulness by modeling this unitary measure as a multidimensional construct. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 81
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Determinants of continuance intention to use gamification applications for task management: an extension of technology continuance theory
    Foroughi, Behzad
    Iranmanesh, Mohammad
    Kuppusamy, Mahaletchimi
    Ganesan, Yuvaraj
    Ghobakhloo, Morteza
    Senali, Madugoda Gunaratnege
    ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2023, 41 (2/3): : 286 - 307
  • [32] Social Network Services in China: An Integrated Model of Centrality, Trust, and Technology Acceptance
    Guo, Chengqi
    Shim, J. P.
    Otondo, Robert
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2010, 13 (02) : 76 - 99
  • [33] Exploring Antecedents of Habit On Social Network Service
    Wu, Ya-Ling
    Tseng, Kuan-Hao
    AMCIS 2012 PROCEEDINGS, 2012,
  • [34] Social Trust Network Embedding
    Xu, Pinghua
    Hu, Wenbin
    Wu, Jia
    Liu, Weiwei
    Du, Bo
    Yang, Jian
    2019 19TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM 2019), 2019, : 678 - 687
  • [35] TRUST MODEL FOR SOCIAL NETWORK
    Netrvalova, Arnostka
    Safarik, Jiri
    EUROPEAN SIMULATION AND MODELLING CONFERENCE 2011, 2011, : 102 - 107
  • [36] The Study of Continuance Intention for Online Social Games
    Zhu, Dauw-Song
    Kuo, Min-Jon
    Liou, Shih-Hao
    2014 IIAI 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED APPLIED INFORMATICS (IIAI-AAI 2014), 2014, : 230 - 235
  • [37] STATISTICAL INVESTIGATION INTO EXPLORING THE USE OF CLOUD COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY BY INCREASING THE USERS' TRUST
    Bendovschi, Cristina
    Ionescu, Bogdan Stefan
    Ionescu, Iuliana Mariana
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2017, 51 (01): : 135 - 150
  • [38] Social Networking Continuance and Success: A Replication Study
    French, Aaron M.
    Green, Andrew William
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 63 (04) : 988 - 997
  • [39] Understanding microblogging continuance intention The directed social network perspective
    Mirkovski, Kristijian
    Jia, Yanli
    Liu, Libo
    Chen, Kun
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE, 2018, 31 (01) : 215 - 238
  • [40] The impact of qualities of social network service on the continuance usage intention
    Lee, Sangjae
    Kim, Byung Gon
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2017, 55 (04) : 701 - 729