Cost-benefit analysis of road-underground co-modality strategies for sustainable city logistics

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Qing [1 ]
Hu, Wanjie [2 ]
Dong, Jianjun [2 ]
Yang, Kai [3 ]
Ren, Rui [4 ]
Chen, Zhilong [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Architecture & Civil Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Safety Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, State Key Lab Rail Traff Control & Safety, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[4] Army Engn Univ PLA, Coll Def Engn, Nanjing 210007, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
City logistics; Modal split; Co-modality; Underground freight transport; Cost-benefit analysis; URBAN FREIGHT TRANSPORT; PASSENGER; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; MODEL; GOODS; FRAMEWORK; TRANSIT; ENERGY; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2024.104585
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
New-type urbanization necessitates smart, green, and efficient logistics systems to meet growing mobility demand. This paper explores the road-underground co-modality for urban freight transport (RUM4UFT) as a solution to urban traffic challenges, which includes three modal split strategies: mixed-use metro lines, metro freight-passenger integration, and purpose-built underground corridors. A monetized cost-benefit analysis (CBA) model is developed to evaluate the major costs of RUM4UFT and the accompanied benefits in transportation, ecological, and logistics economics from the perspectives of the public sectors and logistics service providers. Taking the Beijing Municipal Administrative Center as a case study, the CBA model demonstrates the advantages of RUM4UFT in promoting social and environmental sustainability, with the purposebuilt underground corridor offering the highest long-term investment value. The findings provide valuable insights for advancing city logistics performance through underground transport initiatives.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Democracy and Sustainable Development-What Is the Alternative to Cost-Benefit Analysis?
    Soderbaum, Peter
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 2 (02) : 182 - 190
  • [32] Railway infrastructures sustainable interventions: Proposal for a Cost-Benefit Analysis application
    Couto, Paula
    Salvado, Filipa
    Falcao Silva, Maria Joao
    14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIBRATION ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY OF MACHINERY (VETOMAC XIV), 2018, 211
  • [33] Cost-benefit analysis of using sustainable aviation fuels in South America
    Cui, Qiang
    Chen, Bin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 435
  • [34] A cost-benefit analysis of applying urban agriculture in sustainable park design
    Hosseinpour, Nazanin
    Kazemi, Fatemeh
    Mahdizadeh, Hassan
    LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 112
  • [35] Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable upgrades in existing buildings: A critical review
    Sharbaf, Sara A.
    Schneider-Marin, Patricia
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2025, 328
  • [36] Energy consumption and cost-benefit analysis of hybrid and electric city buses
    Lajunen, Antti
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 38 : 1 - 15
  • [37] Cost-benefit analysis of calibration model maintenance strategies for process monitoring
    Schoot, Mark
    Kapper, Christiaan
    van Kessel, Gijs
    Postma, Geert
    Buydens, Lutgarde MC.
    Jansen, Jeroen J.
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2021, 1180
  • [38] A Model for Cost-Benefit Analysis of Production Ramp-up Strategies
    Medini, Khaled
    Pierne, Antoine
    Erkoyuncu, John Ahmet
    Cornet, Christian
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: TOWARDS SMART AND DIGITAL MANUFACTURING, PT II, 2020, 592 : 731 - 739
  • [39] Cost-benefit analysis of calibration model maintenance strategies for process monitoring
    Schoot, Mark
    Kapper, Christiaan
    van Kessel, Gijs
    Postma, Geert
    Buydens, Lutgarde MC.
    Jansen, Jeroen J.
    Analytica Chimica Acta, 2021, 1180
  • [40] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Alternative Retrofit Strategies for RC Frame Buildings
    Cardone, Donatello
    Gesualdi, Giuseppe
    Perrone, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 23 (02) : 208 - 241