Cost-benefit analysis of road-underground co-modality strategies for sustainable city logistics

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Qing [1 ]
Hu, Wanjie [2 ]
Dong, Jianjun [2 ]
Yang, Kai [3 ]
Ren, Rui [4 ]
Chen, Zhilong [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Architecture & Civil Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Safety Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, State Key Lab Rail Traff Control & Safety, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[4] Army Engn Univ PLA, Coll Def Engn, Nanjing 210007, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
City logistics; Modal split; Co-modality; Underground freight transport; Cost-benefit analysis; URBAN FREIGHT TRANSPORT; PASSENGER; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; MODEL; GOODS; FRAMEWORK; TRANSIT; ENERGY; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2024.104585
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
New-type urbanization necessitates smart, green, and efficient logistics systems to meet growing mobility demand. This paper explores the road-underground co-modality for urban freight transport (RUM4UFT) as a solution to urban traffic challenges, which includes three modal split strategies: mixed-use metro lines, metro freight-passenger integration, and purpose-built underground corridors. A monetized cost-benefit analysis (CBA) model is developed to evaluate the major costs of RUM4UFT and the accompanied benefits in transportation, ecological, and logistics economics from the perspectives of the public sectors and logistics service providers. Taking the Beijing Municipal Administrative Center as a case study, the CBA model demonstrates the advantages of RUM4UFT in promoting social and environmental sustainability, with the purposebuilt underground corridor offering the highest long-term investment value. The findings provide valuable insights for advancing city logistics performance through underground transport initiatives.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Co-modality in city logistics: Sounds good, but how?
    Zhu, Shengda
    Bell, Michael G. H.
    Schulz, Veronica
    Stokoe, Michael
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 168
  • [2] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES TO REDUCE ROAD TRAFFIC INJURIES
    Srijariya, W.
    Riewpaiboon, A.
    Chaikledkaew, U.
    Pongcharoensuk, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (07) : A439 - A439
  • [3] Cost-benefit analysis of FMD control strategies
    不详
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2004, 154 (06) : 158 - 158
  • [4] Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Optimal Timing of Road Infrastructures
    Godinho, Pedro
    Dias, Joana
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2012, 18 (04) : 261 - 269
  • [5] Cost-benefit analysis of road accidents in the forestry sector
    Baidoo, Jacqueline
    Ketu, Jonathan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRASHWORTHINESS, 2022, 27 (05) : 1423 - 1427
  • [6] Valuation of road safety effects in cost-benefit analysis
    Wijnen, Wim
    Wesemann, Paul
    de Blaeij, Arianne
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2009, 32 (04) : 326 - 331
  • [7] A Combined Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Social Cost-Benefit Analysis Approach for Evaluating Sustainable City Logistics Initiatives
    Velickovic, Marko
    Stojanovic, Durdica
    Ilin, Vladimir
    Mircetic, Dejan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [8] Financing sustainable energy: Cost-benefit analysis of CO2 reduction in China
    Cao, Yunping
    Mirzaliev, Sanjar
    Hamza, Fadhila
    Gulzar, Fatima
    Ming, Jing
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2025, 58
  • [9] Cost-benefit analysis in the selection of efficient multipollutant strategies
    Chestnut, LG
    Mills, DM
    Cohan, DS
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2006, 56 (04) : 530 - 536
  • [10] Cost-benefit analysis of road safety measures: applicability and controversies
    Elvik, R
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2001, 33 (01): : 9 - 17