Multiscale systemic risk spillovers in Chinese energy market: Evidence from a tail-event driven network analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Sitong [1 ]
Yuan, Di [1 ]
Zhang, Feipeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Business Sch, Weihai, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian, Peoples R China
关键词
Systemic risk spillover; MODWT; TENET; CoVaR; Energy companies; NATURAL-GAS; OIL; CONNECTEDNESS; VOLATILITY; RETURNS; SECTOR; FIRMS; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108151
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates multiscale systemic risk spillovers in the Chinese energy market by combing the maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform (MODWT) with the tail-event driven network (TENET) model, which could analyze tail events and multiscale network dynamics. It creates multiscale extreme risk spillover networks consisting of energy companies in the coal, oil, natural gas, and new energy. To examine the transmission of risk between different subsectors and companies within the network, we assess overall, subsector, and company-level connectedness across different time scales, respectively. Empirical results show the OPEC oil production cut in 2017, the Sino-US trade war in 2018, the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict started in 2022 boosted overall connectedness and concentration, suggesting that systemic risk connectedness tends to be intersectoral during market crises. The coal subsector appears to be the most integrated and exposed to systemic risk in the short term, while the oil subsector acts as the most influential subsector in the long term. The shortterm risk spillover of the new energy subsector from 2018 to 2020 affects all energy subsectors, but it has moderated. The new energy subsector has a greater long-term impact on the energy market after 2020. Brent crude oil and domestic coal and LNG prices in China significantly drive systemic risk transmission in the Chinese energy sector, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict. This research may benefit governments, regulators, energy companies, and investors under different market conditions and investment horizons.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [31] Copula-MIDAS-TRV model for risk spillover analysis - Evidence from the Chinese stock market
    Wang, Qin
    Li, Xianhua
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2024, 74
  • [32] Interconnections and contagion among cryptocurrencies, DeFi, NFT and traditional financial assets: Some new evidence from tail risk driven network
    Liao, Xin
    Li, Qin
    Chan, Stephen
    Chu, Jeffrey
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2024, 647
  • [33] Time-frequency volatility spillovers across the international crude oil market and Chinese major energy futures markets: Evidence from COVID-19
    Li, Jingyu
    Liu, Ranran
    Yao, Yanzhen
    Xie, Qiwei
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 77
  • [34] A systemic analysis of dynamic frequency spillovers among carbon emissions trading (CET), fossil energy and sectoral stock markets: Evidence from China
    Wu, Ruirui
    Qin, Zhongfeng
    Liu, Bing-Yue
    ENERGY, 2022, 254
  • [35] A robust hybrid method using dynamic network analysis and Weighted Mahalanobis distance for modeling systemic risk in the international energy market
    Xiong, Shi
    Chen, Weidong
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 109
  • [36] Does China's new energy vehicles supply chain stock market have risk spillovers? Evidence from raw material price effect on lithium batteries
    Shi, Yangyan
    Feng, Yu
    Zhang, Qi
    Shuai, Jing
    Niu, Jiangxin
    ENERGY, 2023, 262
  • [37] The nexus between clean energy market risk and US business environment: evidence from wavelet coherence and variance analysis
    Li, Ming
    Isik, Cem
    Yan, Jiale
    Wu, Ran
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2024, 38 (11) : 4415 - 4430
  • [38] Dynamic correlation and risk resonance among industries of Chinese stock market: New evidence from time-frequency domain and complex network perspectives
    Tao, Chen
    Zhong, Guang-Yan
    Li, Jiang-Cheng
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2023, 614
  • [39] Time-frequency extreme risk spillovers between COVID-19 news-based panic sentiment and stock market volatility in the multi-layer network: Evidence from the RCEP countries
    Li, Yanshuang
    Shi, Yujie
    Shi, Yongdong
    Xiong, Xiong
    Yi, Shangkun
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 94
  • [40] Does COVID-19 Epidemic Change the Risk Spillover Characteristics of Chinese Carbon Markets with Energy, Non-Energy Commodity and Stock Markets? Evidence from a Novel Network Method
    Zhu, Pengfei
    Lu, Tuantuan
    FLUCTUATION AND NOISE LETTERS, 2024, 23 (01):