A chemical kinetic analysis of knock propensity of methanol-to-gasoline fuel

被引:0
|
作者
Macdonald, James [1 ]
Lopez-Pintor, Dario [1 ]
Matsubara, Naoyoshi [2 ]
Kitano, Koji [2 ]
Yamada, Ryota [2 ]
机构
[1] Sandia Natl Labs, 7011 East Ave, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[2] Toyota Motor Co Ltd, 1200 Mishuku, Susono, Shizuoka 4101107, Japan
关键词
Methanol-to-gasoline; MTG; Knock propensity; Autoignition; Chemical kinetics; Gasoline surrogate; AUTOIGNITION; ENGINE; CATALYST; BLENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133787
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Production of low carbon gasoline-like fuels such as methanol-to-gasoline (MTG) is a promising approach to achieve rapid greenhouse gas emission reduction of the transportation sector. Despite the fact that gasoline that meets the ASTM D4814 standard for automotive spark-ignition engine fuel can be readily produced from these processes, it is unclear how the composition of MTG may affect engine performance and emissions. In this paper, a surrogate for an MTG is used to numerically study the effects of gasoline composition on knock propensity and on the sensitivity of knock to thermal and fuel stratification, to oxygen dilution and to nitric oxide from exhaust gas recirculation of residual gases. Simulations were performed in ANSYS CHEMKIN-PRO using a comprehensive chemical kinetic mechanism for gasoline surrogates, and results of the MTG surrogate were compared against those of a petroleum-based regular E10 gasoline, termed PACE-20. A premium-grade MTG fuel was also formulated by adding ethanol to the MTG surrogate, and results were compared against those of four premium-grade, gasoline-like fuels representative of future alternative gasoline formulations. Surrogates and mechanism were evaluated by comparison against experimental engine data, and the model showed high accuracy at stoichiometric conditions (mean absolute error of ignition timing equal to 1.46 crank angle degrees) but larger deviations at lean conditions (mean absolute error of ignition timing equal to 5.52 crank angle degrees). Despite the fact that the MTG surrogate has a RON 1.1 units higher than that of PACE-20, it may show higher knock propensity at medium temperature conditions due to a less intense NTC behavior. MTG autoignition was more temperature- and equivalence ratiosensitive than that of PACE20, suggesting that MTG can benefit more from naturally-occurring thermal stratification or from induced fuel stratification of the end gas to mitigate knock intensity. The sensitivity of autoignition reactivity to oxygen dilution and to NO concentration was higher for MTG than for regular gasoline at medium loads, but the opposite trend was observed at high loads due to the effect of pressure on the lowtemperature chemistry of regular gasoline. Approximately 14 %vol ethanol content was required to upgrade the octane rating of MTG from regular grade to premium grade. Adding 13.6 %vol ethanol made the fuel autoignition less sensitive to both oxygen dilution and NO content (ignition time varies approx. 17 % and 50 % less with oxygen dilution and NO addition, respectively, when adding ethanol at high engine loads).
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measurement of knock characteristics of gasoline in terms of a standard fuel
    Edgar, G
    INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1927, 19 (01): : 145 - 146
  • [32] Study on Chemical Kinetic Mechanism and Autoignition Characteristics of Isopentanol/Gasoline Surrogate Fuel
    Zhang, Shuo
    Suo, Xinghan
    Liu, Leilei
    Wang, Lin
    Feng, Hongqing
    Wang, Changhui
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2024, 146 (12):
  • [34] Application of Inelastic Neutron Scattering to the Methanol-to-Gasoline Reaction Over a ZSM-5 Catalyst
    Howe, Russell F.
    McGregor, James
    Parker, Stewart F.
    Collier, Paul
    Lennon, David
    CATALYSIS LETTERS, 2016, 146 (07) : 1242 - 1248
  • [35] Fuel options for the fuel cell vehicle: hydrogen, methanol or gasoline?
    Thomas, CE
    James, BD
    Lomax, FD
    Kuhn, IF
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2000, 25 (06) : 551 - 567
  • [36] METHANOL TOUTED AS BEST ALTERNATE FUEL FOR GASOLINE
    不详
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 1984, 62 (24) : 14 - 16
  • [37] Analysis of the knock intensity in gasoline engines
    Xue, Yuan
    Zhang, Dianchang
    Fu, Maolin
    Fu, Xiaoguang
    Zhendong Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Vibration Engineering, 1998, 11 (02): : 229 - 234
  • [38] Effects of methanol-gasoline improved fuel on the performance of gasoline engine
    Geng, Peng
    Yao, Chun-De
    Wang, Shu-Li
    Zeng, Li-Li
    Zang, Ru-Zhen
    Tang, Chao
    Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2013, 34 (07): : 1379 - 1384
  • [39] The knock study of methanol fuel based on multi-dimensional simulation analysis
    Zhen, Xudong
    Liu, Daming
    Wang, Yang
    ENERGY, 2017, 122 : 552 - 559
  • [40] METHANOL - FUEL OR CHEMICAL
    KING, HH
    WILLIAMS, R
    STOKES, CA
    HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 1978, 57 (06): : 141 - 145