Investigation on partial install of hysteretic dampers into lower stories of high-rise buildings - Retrofitting against long-period ground motion

被引:0
|
作者
Shimada Y. [1 ]
Sato D. [1 ]
Nagae T. [2 ]
Kitamura H. [1 ]
Fukuyama K. [2 ]
Kajiwara K. [2 ]
Inoue T. [2 ]
Nakashima M. [2 ]
Saito T. [3 ]
Fukuwa N. [4 ]
Hitaka T. [5 ]
机构
[1] EERC, NIED
[2] USEE, BRI
[3] DPRI, Kyoto Univ.
来源
关键词
Dynamic response analysis; Energy absorption; High-rise building; Long-period ground motion; Response reduction; Retrofit;
D O I
10.3130/aijs.75.549
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In long-period ground motions, high-rise buildings are subjected to large cumulative deformations as well as large story drifts. Retrofitting with dampers may be one of the most effective solutions to reduce such seismic responses. This study examines the influences of steel dampers partially installed into the lower part of high-rise buildings. A series of dynamic response analyses are conducted for typical steel high-rise buildings. A long-period ground motion is adopted whose energy spectrum has a peak amplitude at three seconds, and twenty-one story buildings and thirty-five story buildings are substituted by frame models. The results show that the total energy absorption of the dampers installed into forty-percent stories can be equivalent to that of the dampers installed into the whole stories. On the other hand, the maximum drift of the story located right on the lower part having dampers would become 1.4 times larger than those of the lower part.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 557
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Optimal multi-type sensor placement for monitoring high-rise buildings under bidirectional long-period ground motions
    Hu, Rong-Pan
    Xu, You-Lin
    Zhao, Xin
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2020, 27 (06):
  • [22] Component-Level Seismic Performance Assessment of Instrumented Super High-Rise Buildings under Bidirectional Long-Period Ground Motions
    Xu, You-Lin
    Hu, Rongpan
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 147 (02)
  • [23] Seismic Resistance Capacity of High-Rise Buildings Subjected to Long-Period Ground Motions: E-Defense Shaking Table Test
    Chung, Yu-Lin
    Nagae, Takuya
    Hitaka, Toko
    Nakashima, Masayoshi
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 136 (06) : 637 - 644
  • [24] Seismic retrofit of a high-rise steel structure considering long-period and long-duration ground motions
    Du D.-S.
    Song B.-X.
    Xu W.-Z.
    Wang S.-G.
    Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 37 (07): : 189 - 200
  • [25] Seismic collapse analysis of high-rise reinforced concrete frames under long-period ground motions
    Bai, Yongtao
    Guan, Shaoyu
    Lin, Xuchuan
    Mou, Ben
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2019, 28 (01):
  • [26] Investigation and analysis on the structural characteristics of the recent base isolated buildings corresponding to long-period ground motion
    Omiya M.
    Kitamura H.
    AIJ Journal of Technology and Design, 2019, 25 (59): : 61 - 66
  • [27] Questionnaire surveys on damages at high-rise buildings and synthesized near-fault long-period strong ground motions of the 2018 Hualien, Taiwan, earthquake
    Wang, Xin
    Nagano, Masayuki
    Si, Hongjun
    Chang, Wen-Yen
    Kuo, Chun-Hsiang
    Lin, Che-Min
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 61
  • [28] Resilience evaluation of elastic-plastic high-rise buildings under resonant long-duration ground motion
    Akehashi, Hiroki
    Takewaki, Izuru
    JAPAN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW, 2022, 5 (04) : 373 - 385
  • [29] Seismic fragility analysis of human perception in high-rise buildings subjected to far-field long-period earthquake ground motions: A case study for Shanghai tower
    Ning, Chao-Lie
    Samit, Shrestha
    Ji, Kun
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND RESILIENCE, 2024, 3 (02): : 236 - 251
  • [30] Seismic capacity of retrofitted beam-column connections in high-rise steel frames when subjected to long-period ground motions
    Chung, Yu-Lin
    Nagae, Takuya
    Matsumiya, Tomohiro
    Nakashima, Masayoshi
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2012, 41 (04): : 735 - 753