Comparison between Compartment and Computational Fluid Dynamics Models for Simulating Reactive Crystallization Processes

被引:0
|
作者
Querio, Andrea [1 ]
Shiea, Mohsen [2 ]
Buffo, Antonio [1 ]
Marchisio, Daniele Luca [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dipartimento Sci Applicata & Tecnol, Corso Duca Abruzzi 24, I-10129 Turin, Italy
[2] IFP Energies Nouvelles, F-69360 Solaize, France
关键词
RECURRENCE CFD; PRECIPITATION; DESIGN; GROWTH; COPRECIPITATION; OPTIMIZATION; TRANSPORT; MIXER;
D O I
10.1021/acs.iecr.4c01483
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This work compares two different computational approaches aimed at describing the reactive crystallization or precipitation process in stirred tanks. The first approach is a full computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model coupled with population balance modeling, which is accelerated by the operator-splitting method and hybrid MPI-OpenMP parallelization. Here, emphasis is given to the hybrid MPI-OpenMP parallelization that improves parallel scalability, when the operator-splitting method is used to take relatively large time steps, despite the large separation of time-scales in such processes. The second approach is a compartment model (CM) enhanced by an automatic tool for the generation of compartments based on some relevant features of the system. The two models are compared for a case study of particular interest: the reactive coprecipitation of Ni-Mn-Co hydroxide in a continuous stirred tank, main precursor to produce cathode active materials of lithium-ion batteries. The obtained results demonstrate the effectiveness of hybrid parallelization in improving the parallel scalability of the CFD model. In addition, it is shown that the CM can produce less accurate but still relevant predictions with relatively small computational cost.
引用
收藏
页码:21991 / 22004
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A new model on simulating smoke transport with computational fluid dynamics
    Chow, WK
    Yin, R
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 39 (06) : 611 - 620
  • [22] Letter to the Editor on "Simulating the Nasal Cycle with Computational Fluid Dynamics"
    Chung, Seung Kyu
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2015, 153 (02) : 308 - 308
  • [23] Simulating Smoke Filling in Big Halls by Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Chow, W. K.
    Chow, C. L.
    Li, S. S.
    MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN ENGINEERING, 2011, 2011
  • [24] A comparison between computational fluid dynamic and Reynolds approaches for simulating transient EHL line contacts
    Almqvist, T
    Almqvist, A
    Larsson, R
    TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 37 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [25] Fire safety analysis of a railway compartment using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Enbaya, Anwar
    Asim, Taimoor
    Mishra, Rakesh
    Raj Rao, B.K.N.
    International Journal of COMADEM, 2015, 18 (03): : 37 - 44
  • [26] Computational issues in hybrid multizonal/computational fluid dynamics models
    Bezzo, F
    Macchietto, S
    Pantelides, CC
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2005, 51 (04) : 1169 - 1177
  • [27] Simulating of Microbial Growth Scale Up in a Stirred Tank Bioreactor for Aerobic Processes using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Hernandez, S.
    Nino, L.
    Gelves, G.
    UNIVERSITAS RIAU INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT 2020 (URICSE-2020), 2020, 1655
  • [28] Comparison of computational fluid dynamics and fluid structure interaction models for the performance prediction of tidal current turbines
    Badshah, Mujahid
    Badshah, Saeed
    Jan, Sakhi
    JOURNAL OF OCEAN ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2020, 5 (02) : 164 - 172
  • [29] Comparison between two computational fluid dynamics methods for gust response predictions
    Wu, Zhenlong
    Gao, Yuan
    He, Xiaoming
    Fu, Weizhe
    Shi, Jianqiang
    Zhang, Zhibo
    Zhou, Ruitao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2023, 237 (12) : 2833 - 2843
  • [30] Comparison of pulmonary arterial flow phenomena in spiral and Lecompte models by computational fluid dynamics
    Tang, TD
    Chiu, IS
    Chen, HC
    Cheng, KY
    Chen, SJ
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 122 (03): : 529 - 534