Comparative analysis of perpetual pavement structures based on pavement performance and life cycle cost

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] Zhu, Yuqin
[2] Ni, Fujian
[3] Gu, Xingyu
来源
Ni, F. (ifujian@gmail.com) | 1600年 / Southeast University卷 / 30期
关键词
Comparative analysis - Economical evaluation - Life cycle cost analysis - Pavement performance - Performance comparison - Permanent deformations - Perpetual pavements - Rich binder layer;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2014.01.016
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pavement performance and economic efficiency are researched on the perpetual test pavement of Yijiang-Suzhou Express Highway in Jiangsu province, China. Test sections were continuously monitored. The conditions and developing laws of deflection, rutting and cracking are compared among the perpetual pavement with the rich binder layer (RBL), the perpetual pavement without the RBL, and the conventional semi-rigid asphalt pavement in the past eight years after opening for traffic. Economical evaluation is conducted via life cycle cost analysis (LCCA). Based on the performance comparison and LCCA analysis, sections with the RBL have good crack resistance, but they are not very satisfactory in the aspect of permanent deformation; the conventional semi-rigid asphalt pavement is the least economic one due to requiring more frequent maintenance. Research results show that the perpetual pavement without RBL is a more appropriate structure for the test site. © Copyright.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] First steps for the perpetual pavement design: Through the analysis of the fatigue life
    Hernandez, N.
    Hernandez, J.
    Martinez, R.
    FOUR-POINT BENDING, 2012, : 99 - 109
  • [32] Enhancing life cycle cost analysis with a novel cost classification framework for pavement rehabilitation projects
    Abdelaty, Ahmed
    Jeong, Hyungseok David
    Dannen, Bryan
    Todey, Francis
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2016, 34 (10) : 724 - 736
  • [33] Risk-based life-cycle cost analysis for project-level pavement management
    Reigle, JA
    Zaniewski, JP
    PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT, MONITORING, AND ACCELERATED TESTING 2002: PAVEMENT DESIGN, MANAGEMENT, AND PERFORMANCE, 2002, (1816): : 34 - 42
  • [34] Development of an Integrated Web-Based Application for Pavement Design and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis
    Chau, Anh D.
    Nguyen, Long D.
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2024: SUSTAINABILITY, RESILIENCE, INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, AND MATERIALS DESIGN IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, : 816 - 825
  • [35] Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of recycled solid waste materials in highway pavement: A review
    Li, Jin
    Xiao, Feipeng
    Zhang, Lanfang
    Amirkhanian, Serji N.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 : 1182 - 1206
  • [36] Analysis of Perpetual Pavement Experiment Sections in China
    Timm, David H.
    Robbins, Mary M.
    Huber, Gerald
    Yang, Yongshun
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2011, (2226) : 94 - 103
  • [37] A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost analysis (LCCA), mechanical and long-term leaching evaluation of road pavement structures containing multiple secondary materials
    Azadgoleh, Mehrdad Asadi
    Mohammadi, Mohammad Mahdi
    AzariJafari, Hessam
    Santos, Joao
    Ahmadi, Arman
    Alavi, Mohammad Zia
    Ayar, Pooyan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 458
  • [38] Optimal Strategy of Pavement Preventive Maintenance Considering Life-Cycle Cost Analysis
    Ding, Tingting
    Sun, Lijun
    Chen, Zhang
    INTELLIGENT AND INTEGRATED SUSTAINABLE MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PROCEEDINGS FROM THE 13TH COTA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF TRANSPORTATION PROFESSIONALS (CICTP2013), 2013, 96 : 1679 - 1685
  • [39] Applying economic concepts from life-cycle cost analysis to pavement management analysis
    Zimmerman, KA
    Smith, KD
    Grogg, MG
    PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING: PAVEMENT DESIGN, MANAGEMENT, AND PERFORMANCE, 2000, (1699): : 58 - 65
  • [40] Life Cycle Cost Analysis on pavement inspection intervals considering maintenance work delay
    Daeseok Han
    Myungsik Do
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2015, 19 : 1716 - 1726