Bioconversion of mango waste blended with poultry waste and cow dung into useful manure by aerobic composting

被引:0
|
作者
Lakshminarasimaiah, N. [1 ]
Meenambal, T. [1 ,2 ]
Thyagarajan, Lakshmi Priya [1 ,3 ]
Ramesh, N. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Adhiyamaan College of Engineering, Hosur-635 109, TN, India
[2] Department of Civil Engineering, Govt. College of Technology, Coimbatore-641 013, TN, India
[3] Govt. College of Technology, Anna University, Coimbatore, TN, India
[4] Department of Civil Engineering, K.S.R College of Technology, Tiruchengode, TN, India
关键词
Carbon - Waste treatment - Water pollution - Fruits - Fertilizers - Manures - Nitrogen - Blending - pH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Solid waste can be disposed off either by diluting or by making it into useful manure. Since most of the land, water and atmosphere have been polluted largely, the only way to prevent pollution is to make the waste into a useful product. The present study investigates feasibility of blending the fruit waste (mango waste) with poultry waste and cow dung to produce a value added compost. Mango waste usually creates nuisance when compared to other fruit and vegetable waste as it gives foul smell. To achieve good composting mango waste was blended with poultry waste and cow dung at six different weight proportions. Chemical properties of compost like pH, nitrogen, carbon, phosphorus and potassium were observed at different periods, i.e., on the days 1, 21 and 35. Finally, the carbon to nitrogen ratio was compared with all the five samples to identify the best compost. The samples with ratio 1:1:1 and 2:1:1 without mango seeds were considered to be more reliable and efficient to be used as compost.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 854
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Relative Effectiveness of Methane (Biogas) Production from Dry Grass Soaked with Vegetable Waste, Poultry Waste and Cow Dung
    Rajesh, S.
    Premkumar, R.
    Neethipathi, Jayadevi
    ORIENTAL JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2019, 35 (02) : 732 - 737
  • [22] LIQUID COMPOSTING OF DAIRY COW WASTE
    HOFFMAN, B
    JOURNAL OF MILK AND FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1973, 36 (11): : 583 - 583
  • [23] FACTORS INFLUENCING COMPOSTING POULTRY WASTE
    Kopec, Michal
    Chmiel, Maria
    Gondek, Krzysztof
    Mierzwa-Hersztek, Monika
    Antonkiewicz, Jacek
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 16 (05): : 93 - 100
  • [24] Mechanisms and effects of novel ammonifying microorganisms on nitrogen ammonification in cow manure waste composting
    Xu, Zhiming
    Li, Ronghua
    Zhang, Xiu
    Liu, Jun
    Xu, Xuerui
    Wang, Shaowen
    Lan, Tianyang
    Zhang, Kang
    Gao, Feng
    He, Qifu
    Pan, Junting
    Quan, Fusheng
    Zhang, Zengqiang
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 169 : 167 - 178
  • [25] Role of sawdust and cow dung on compost maturity during rotary drum composting of flower waste
    Sharma, Dayanand
    Yadav, Kunwar D.
    Kumar, Sunil
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 264 : 285 - 289
  • [26] A Study on Aerobic Composting of Organic Waste
    Cai, Xiaolong
    Huang, Xinying
    Ji, Huimin
    Xie, Qingwen
    Ge, Yunfeng
    ADVANCES IN ENERGY SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING III, 2019, 2106
  • [27] Aerobic composting of tobacco solid waste
    Briski, F
    Gomzi, Z
    Horgas, N
    Vukovic, M
    ACTA CHIMICA SLOVENICA, 2003, 50 (04) : 715 - 729
  • [28] Effects of sulphur and Thiobacillus thioparus on cow manure aerobic composting
    Gu, Wenjie
    Zhang, Fabao
    Xu, Peizhi
    Tang, Shuanhu
    Xie, Kaizhi
    Huang, Xu
    Huang, Qiaoyi
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (11) : 6529 - 6535
  • [29] Methane Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Cow Dung, Chicken Manure, Pig Manure and Sewage Waste
    Sebola, M. R.
    Tesfagiorgis, H. B.
    Muzenda, E.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING, WCE 2015, VOL I, 2015, : 592 - 598
  • [30] Chemical Characterization of Cow Manure and Poultry Manure after Composting with Privet and Cypress Residues
    Haroon, B.
    Abbasi, A. M.
    Faridullah
    An, P.
    Pervez, A.
    Irshad, M.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2018, 49 (22) : 2854 - 2866