Enhancing hydrologic LiDAR digital elevation models: Bridging hydrographic gaps at fine scales

被引:1
|
作者
Wu, Di [1 ]
Li, Ruopu [2 ]
Edidem, Michael [2 ]
Wang, Guangxing [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Geog, Boulder, CO USA
[2] Southern Illinois Univ, Sch Earth Syst & Sustainabil, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LiDAR; DEM; hydrography; hydrologic connectivity; National Hydrography Dataset; FLOW-DIRECTION; DRAINAGE DIRECTION; FLAT SURFACES; RESOLUTION; EXTRACTION; ALGORITHM; NETWORKS; ASSIGNMENT; DEM;
D O I
10.1111/1752-1688.13239
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
High-resolution digital elevation models (HRDEMs), derived from LiDAR, are widely used for mapping hydrographic details in flat terrains. However, artificial flow barriers, particularly from roads, elevate terrain and prematurely end flowlines. Drainage barrier processing (DBP), such as HRDEM excavation, is employed to address this issue. However, there is a gap in quantitatively assessing the impact of DBP on HRDEM-derived flowlines, especially at finer scales. This study fills that gap by quantitatively assessing how DBP improves flowline quality at finer scales. We evaluated HRDEM-derived flowlines that were generated using different flow direction algorithms, developing a framework to measure the effects of flow barrier removal. The results show that the primary factor influencing flowline quality is the presence of flow accumulation artifacts. Quality issues also stem from differences between natural and artificial flow paths, unrealistic flowlines in flat areas, complex canal networks, and ephemeral drainage ways. Notably, the improvement achieved by DBP is demonstrated to be more than 6%, showcasing its efficacy in reducing the impact of flow barriers on hydrologic connectivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1269
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison and fusion of LIDAR and InSAR digital elevation models over urban areas
    Gamba, P
    Dell'Acqua, F
    Houshmand, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 24 (22) : 4289 - 4300
  • [22] LIDAR-GENERATED DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS FOR HAZARD DETECTION - REQUIREMENTS AND ANALYSIS
    Chen, Po-Ting
    Kaki, Siddarth
    San Martin, A. Miguel
    Skulsky, David
    Katake, Anup
    Trawny, Nikolas
    GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL 2019, 2019, 169 : 105 - 116
  • [23] A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF LIDAR-DERIVED DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS
    Liu, XiaoHang
    XXIV ISPRS CONGRESS IMAGING TODAY, FORESEEING TOMORROW, COMMISSION IV, 2022, 5-4 : 67 - 73
  • [24] Deriving ground surface digital elevation models from LiDAR data with geostatistics
    Lloyd, CD
    Atkinson, PM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2006, 20 (05) : 535 - 563
  • [25] Automatic building extraction from LIDAR digital elevation models and WorldView imagery
    Ekhtari, Nima
    Zoej, Mohammad Javad Valadan
    Sahebi, Mahmod Reza
    Mohammadzadeh, Ali
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 3
  • [26] Are fine resolution digital elevation models always the best choice in digital soil mapping?
    Cavazzi, Stefano
    Corstanje, Ron
    Mayr, Thomas
    Hannam, Jacqueline
    Fealy, Reamonn
    GEODERMA, 2013, 195 : 111 - 121
  • [27] A Relief Dependent Evaluation of Digital Elevation Models on Different Scales for Northern Chile
    Kramm, Tanja
    Hoffmeister, Dirk
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2019, 8 (10)
  • [28] A comparison of drainage networks derived from digital elevation models at two scales
    Wang, XH
    Yin, ZY
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1998, 210 (1-4) : 221 - 241
  • [29] A comparison of drainage networks derived from digital elevation models at two scales
    School of Planning, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0016, United States
    不详
    J. Hydrol., 1-4 (221-241):
  • [30] Validation of digital elevation models from SRTM X-SAR for applications in hydrologic modeling
    Ludwig, Ralf
    Schneider, Philipp
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 60 (05) : 339 - 358