A classification framework for generative artificial intelligence for social good

被引:0
|
作者
Crumbly, Jack [1 ]
Pal, Raktim [2 ]
Altay, Nezih [3 ]
机构
[1] Tuskegee Univ, Coll Business & Informat Sci, Management Dept, Andrew F Brimmer Hall,Rm 400F, Tuskegee, AL 36088 USA
[2] James Madison Univ, Harrisonburg, VA USA
[3] DePaul Univ, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Artificial intelligence (AI); Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI); Social good; Classification; TASK-TECHNOLOGY FIT; AI; ACCEPTANCE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103129
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Many policy makers and corporate leaders are adjusting their strategies to harness the power of GenAI. There are numerous debates on how GenAI would fundamentally change existing business models. However, there is not much discussion on roles of generative AI in the domain of social good. Broader views covering potential opportunities of GenAI to enable diverse initiatives in the social good space are largely missing. We intend to reduce the gap by developing a classification framework that should allow researchers gauge the potential impact of GenAI for social good initiatives. Through case analysis, we assess how value-added abilities of GenAI may influence various social good initiatives. We adopt/develop two loosely connected classification frameworks that are grounded in task-technology fit (TTF) theory. Subsequently, we investigate how our analyses of GenAI initiatives utilizing different dimensions of these two frameworks may be synthesized to provide appropriate explanation for potential success of GenAI for social good. We develop five propositions that will provide guidance to practitioners and researchers. The theoretically grounded analysis of 21 GenAI for social good use cases based on the two classification frameworks, and the resulting propositions are the original contributions of this paper to the AI for social good literature.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Generative artificial intelligence in surgery
    Rodler, Severin
    Ganjavi, Conner
    De Backer, Pieter
    Magoulianitis, Vasileios
    Ramacciotti, Lorenzo Storino
    Abreu, Andre Luis De Castro
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    SURGERY, 2024, 175 (06) : 1496 - 1502
  • [22] Generative artificial intelligence and ELT
    Moorhouse, Benjamin Luke
    ELT JOURNAL, 2024, 78 (04) : 378 - 392
  • [23] Analysis Generative artificial intelligence
    Stokel-Walker, Chris
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2024, 247 (3492) : 18 - 18
  • [24] On Chatbots and Generative Artificial Intelligence
    Oermann, Eric Karl
    Kondziolka, Douglas
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 92 (04) : 665 - 666
  • [25] Generative Artificial Intelligence: Fundamentals
    Corchado, Juan M.
    Lopez, F. Sebastian
    Nunez, V. Juan M.
    Garcia, S. Raul
    Chamoso, Pablo
    ADCAIJ-ADVANCES IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE JOURNAL, 2023, 12 (01):
  • [26] Generative artificial intelligence in ophthalmology
    Waisberg, Ethan
    Ong, Joshua
    Kamran, Sharif Amit
    Masalkhi, Mouayad
    Paladugu, Phani
    Zaman, Nasif
    Lee, Andrew G.
    Tavakkoli, Alireza
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 70 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [27] ‘AI for Social Good’: Whose Good and Who’s Good? Introduction to the Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence for Social Good
    Cowls J.
    Philosophy & Technology, 2021, 34 (Suppl 1) : 1 - 5
  • [28] Generative Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT
    Byrne, Matthew D.
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2023, 38 (03) : 519 - 522
  • [29] Generative artificial intelligence in oncology
    Ganjavi, Conner
    Melamed, Sam
    Biedermann, Brett
    Eppler, Michael B.
    Rodler, Severin
    Layne, Ethan
    Cei, Francesco
    Gill, Inderbir
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2025, 35 (03) : 205 - 213
  • [30] Generative artificial intelligence and surgeons
    Lai, Paul B. S.
    SURGICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 27 (03) : 128 - 130