A classification framework for generative artificial intelligence for social good

被引:0
|
作者
Crumbly, Jack [1 ]
Pal, Raktim [2 ]
Altay, Nezih [3 ]
机构
[1] Tuskegee Univ, Coll Business & Informat Sci, Management Dept, Andrew F Brimmer Hall,Rm 400F, Tuskegee, AL 36088 USA
[2] James Madison Univ, Harrisonburg, VA USA
[3] DePaul Univ, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Artificial intelligence (AI); Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI); Social good; Classification; TASK-TECHNOLOGY FIT; AI; ACCEPTANCE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103129
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Many policy makers and corporate leaders are adjusting their strategies to harness the power of GenAI. There are numerous debates on how GenAI would fundamentally change existing business models. However, there is not much discussion on roles of generative AI in the domain of social good. Broader views covering potential opportunities of GenAI to enable diverse initiatives in the social good space are largely missing. We intend to reduce the gap by developing a classification framework that should allow researchers gauge the potential impact of GenAI for social good initiatives. Through case analysis, we assess how value-added abilities of GenAI may influence various social good initiatives. We adopt/develop two loosely connected classification frameworks that are grounded in task-technology fit (TTF) theory. Subsequently, we investigate how our analyses of GenAI initiatives utilizing different dimensions of these two frameworks may be synthesized to provide appropriate explanation for potential success of GenAI for social good. We develop five propositions that will provide guidance to practitioners and researchers. The theoretically grounded analysis of 21 GenAI for social good use cases based on the two classification frameworks, and the resulting propositions are the original contributions of this paper to the AI for social good literature.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Harmonizing Artificial Intelligence for Social Good
    Berberich N.
    Nishida T.
    Suzuki S.
    Philosophy & Technology, 2020, 33 (4) : 613 - 638
  • [3] Synthetic duality: A framework for analyzing generative artificial intelligence's representation of social reality
    Karell, Daniel
    Sachs, Jeffrey
    Barrett, Ryan
    POETICS, 2025, 108
  • [4] Framework for Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Education
    Shailendra, Samar
    Kadel, Rajan
    Sharma, Aakanksha
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 2024, 67 (05) : 777 - 785
  • [5] Social Dangers of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Review and Guidelines
    Yang, Alan T.
    Yang, Andrew T.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, DGO 2024, 2024, : 654 - 658
  • [6] The good, the bad, and the GPT: Reviewing the impact of generative artificial intelligence on psychology
    Salah, Mohammed
    Abdelfattah, Fadi
    Al Halbusi, Hussam
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 59
  • [7] Generative Artificial Intelligence
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Chen, Jonathan H.
    Kohli, Marc D.
    Smith, Andrew D.
    Liao, Joshua M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (08) : 1318 - 1320
  • [8] Generative Artificial Intelligence
    Hawk, Heather
    Coriasco, Michael
    Jones, Jeffrey R.
    NURSE EDUCATOR, 2025, 50 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [9] Generative artificial intelligence
    Banh, Leonardo
    Strobel, Gero
    ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2023, 33 (01)