Perceived Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction: A Review

被引:1
|
作者
Tusseyeva, Inara [1 ,2 ]
Sandygulova, Anara [3 ]
Rubagotti, Matteo [3 ]
机构
[1] Astana IT Univ, Dept Intelligent Syst & Cybersecur, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
[2] Nazarbayev Univ, Inst Smart Syst & Artificial Intelligence, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
[3] Nazarbayev Univ, Sch Engn & Digital Sci, Dept Robot & Mechatron, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2024年 / 12卷
关键词
Robots; Human-robot interaction; Reviews; Robot sensing systems; Humanoid robots; Surveys; Semantics; Manipulators; Internet; Habituation; human-robot interaction; perceived intelligence; pre-test-post-test variation; ANTHROPOMORPHISM; GESTURES; ANIMACY;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3478751
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to provide a survey on the perception of robot intelligence. After a general overview, the paper specifically focuses on how perceived intelligence varies either between before and after the experiment ("pre-test-post-test variation"), and in subsequent sessions due to habituation. After reviewing the main characteristics of autonomous agents and robots that have been shown in the literature to influence the perception of robot intelligence, papers focusing on the variation in time of perceived intelligence are analyzed in detail. Even if no unanimous conclusion was reached in the literature, evidence suggests that, in general, when a significant variation is detected, perceived intelligence tends to increase from pre-test to post-test evaluations when commercial or more recent robot platforms are used, while it tends to decrease in the case of custom-made or less recent robots. On the other hand, when a significant variation is detected, perceived intelligence seems to increase due to habituation.
引用
收藏
页码:151348 / 151359
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Human-Robot Interaction in Rehabilitation and Assistance: a Review
    Abolfazl Mohebbi
    Current Robotics Reports, 2020, 1 (3): : 131 - 144
  • [12] A Review of NASA Human-Robot Interaction in Space
    Kimberly Hambuchen
    Jessica Marquez
    Terrence Fong
    Current Robotics Reports, 2021, 2 (3): : 265 - 272
  • [13] A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Perceived Safety in Human-Robot Interaction
    Akalin, Neziha
    Kiselev, Andrey
    Kristoffersson, Annica
    Loutfi, Amy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2023, 15 (12) : 1993 - 2004
  • [14] Perceived safety in physical human-robot interaction-A survey
    Rubagotti, Matteo
    Tusseyeva, Inara
    Baltabayeva, Sara
    Summers, Danna
    Sandygulova, Anara
    ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2022, 151
  • [15] Human-Augmented Robotic Intelligence (HARI) for Human-Robot Interaction
    Mruthyunjaya, Vishwas
    Jankowski, Charles
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE (FTC) 2019, VOL 2, 2020, 1070 : 204 - 223
  • [16] A Review of Powered Backdrivability of Robot Actuators for Human-Robot Interaction
    Du, Qinghao
    Zhang, Tuopu
    Yang, Guilin
    Chen, Chin-yin
    Wang, Weijun
    Zhang, Chi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 IEEE 16TH CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA 2021), 2021, : 1115 - 1120
  • [17] Introduction to the Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence and Human-Robot Interaction
    Hayes, Bradley
    Cakmak, Maya
    Rosenthal, Stephanie
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2018, 7 (02)
  • [18] Human-Robot Interaction
    Jia, Yunyi
    Zhang, Biao
    Li, Miao
    King, Brady
    Meghdari, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS, 2018, 2018
  • [19] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sidobre, Daniel
    Broquere, Xavier
    Mainprice, Jim
    Burattini, Ernesto
    Finzi, Alberto
    Rossi, Silvia
    Staffa, Mariacarla
    ADVANCED BIMANUAL MANIPULATION: RESULTS FROM THE DEXMART PROJECT, 2012, 80 : 123 - +
  • [20] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sethumadhavan, Arathi
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2012, 20 (03) : 27 - +