Predicting nickel catalyst deactivation in biogas steam and dry reforming for hydrogen production using machine learning

被引:1
|
作者
Kumbhat, Arsh [1 ]
Madaan, Aryan [1 ]
Goel, Rhythm [1 ]
Appari, Srinivas [2 ]
Al-Fatesh, Ahmed S. [3 ]
Osman, Ahmed I. [4 ]
机构
[1] Birla Inst Technol & Sci Pilani, Dept Chem Engn, Pilani Campus, Pilani 333031, Rajasthan, India
[2] Birla Inst Technol & Sci Pilani, Dept Chem Engn, Hyderabad Campus, Secunderabad 500078, Telangana, India
[3] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Chem Engn, POB 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
[4] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Belfast BT9 5AG, North Ireland
关键词
Biogas; Steam Reforming; Dry Reforming; Catalyst Deactivation; Hydrogen production; Artificial Neural Networks; Random Forests; MODEL BIOGAS; SULFUR; REGENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2024.09.020
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study employs Random Forests (RF) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to model the transient behavior of Ni catalyst deactivation during steam and dry reforming of model biogas containing H2S, with a focus on hydrogen production. Deactivation, induced by carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning, is a complex and transient phenomenon demanding precise kinetic mechanisms for accurately predicting Ni catalyst behavior in biogas reforming. Black-box machine learning (ML) models are developed, incorporating catalyst properties, biogas composition, and operating conditions. Encompassing both dry and steam reforming, the ML models aim to predict catalyst behavior, expressed in terms of packed bed reactor exit mole fractions (H-2, CO, CH4, and CO2) and conversions (CH4 and CO2). The ML models are trained and tested across a temperature range of 700-900 C with 0-145 ppm of H2S in model biogas (CH4/CO2 ratio varying from 1.0 to 2.0). RF outperforms the ANN across all performance metrics, including overall R-2 and root mean squared error (RMSE). The RF achieves a mean overall R-2 of 0.979, with training and testing RMSE equal to 6.7x10(-3 )and 1.47x10(-2) respectively. In contrast, the ANN achieves a mean overall R-2 of 0.939, with training and testing RMSE equal to 2.6x10(-2) and 2.55x10(-2) respectively. Moreover, pre-trained RF models are validated with unseen data of dry reforming of biogas containing 30 ppm of H2S (25 data points). It is suggested that 35 % of this unseen experimental data is required to train the RF model for it to predict catalyst deactivation, achieving a validation R sufficiently(2)> 0.9. The mean overall R-2 values attained by the RF fine-tuned on 35 % of the unseen experiment data for both CH4 and CO2 conversions, as well as for all mole fraction predictions, are 0.952 and 0.948, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1833 / 1846
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experimental Study on Sulfur Deactivation and Regeneration of Ni-Based Catalyst in Dry Reforming of Biogas
    Chein, Rei-Yu
    Chen, Yen-Chung
    Chen, Wei-Hsin
    CATALYSTS, 2021, 11 (07)
  • [22] Simulation modelling of hydrogen production from steam reforming of methane and biogas
    Kumar, Ravindra
    Kumar, Anil
    Pal, Amit
    FUEL, 2024, 362
  • [23] A novel nickel catalyst supported on activated coal fly ash for syngas production via biogas dry reforming
    Gao, Yuchen
    Jiang, Jianguo
    Meng, Yuan
    Aihemaiti, Aikelaimu
    Ju, Tongyao
    Chen, Xuejing
    Yan, Feng
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 149 : 786 - 793
  • [24] EFFECT OF REFORMING CONDITIONS IN THE CATALYST DEACTIVATION IN THE PYROLYSIS-REFORMING OF BIOMASS FOR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION
    Arregi, A.
    Amutio, M.
    Alvarez, J.
    Barbarias, I.
    Santamaria, L.
    Cortazar, M.
    Fernandez, E.
    Olazar, M.
    PAPERS OF THE 26TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2018, : 998 - 1004
  • [25] Hydrogen production by oxidative methanol reforming on Pd/ZnO: Catalyst deactivation
    Liu, ST
    Takahashi, K
    Fuchigami, K
    Uematsu, K
    APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL, 2006, 299 (58-65) : 58 - 65
  • [26] Hydrogen production from the steam reforming of biogas over Ni-based catalyst: The role of promoters and supports
    Liu, Ji
    Sun, Huai-de
    Hu, Si-Han
    Hu, Bin
    Fang, Zhi-mo
    Li, Ji-hong
    Zhang, Zhen-xi
    Lu, Qiang
    ENERGY, 2024, 311
  • [27] Predicting hydrogen production in porous foams for steam methane reforming: A combined approach using computational fluid dynamics and machine learning regression models
    Jafarizadeh, Azadeh
    Panjepour, Masoud
    Emami, Mohsen Davazdah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2025, 120 : 422 - 443
  • [28] A review of recent developments in hydrogen production via biogas dry reforming
    Gao, Yuchen
    Jiang, Jianguo
    Meng, Yuan
    Yan, Feng
    Aihemaiti, Aikelaimu
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 171 : 133 - 155
  • [29] Combined steam and dry reforming of methane for syngas production from biogas using bimodal pore catalysts
    Dan, Monica
    Mihet, Maria
    Borodi, Gheorghe
    Lazar, Mihaela D.
    CATALYSIS TODAY, 2021, 366 : 87 - 96
  • [30] Highly active steam reforming catalyst for hydrogen and syngas production
    Numaguchi, T
    CATALYSIS SURVEYS FROM JAPAN, 2001, 5 (01) : 59 - 63