Grading of Gliomas by Contrast-Enhanced CT Radiomics Features

被引:2
|
作者
Maskani M. [1 ]
Abbasi S. [1 ]
Etemad-Rezaee H. [2 ]
Abdolahi H. [3 ]
Zamanpour A. [1 ]
Montazerabadi A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
[2] Department of Neurosurgery, Ghaem Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
[3] Department of Radiologic Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman
[4] Medical Physics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
来源
关键词
Cancer; CT Scan; Glioma; Machine Learning; Neoplasms; Radiomics; Tumor;
D O I
10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2306-1628
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Gliomas, as Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors, are greatly common with 80% of malignancy. Treatment methods for gliomas, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy depend on the grade, size, location, and the patient’s age. Objective: This study aimed to quantify glioma based on the radiomics analysis and classify its grade into High-grade Glioma (HGG) or Low-grade Glioma (LGG) by various machine-learning methods using contrast-enhanced brain Computerized Tomography (CT) scans. Material and Methods: This retrospective study involved acquiring and segmenting data, selecting and extracting features, classifying, analyzing, and evaluating classifiers. The study included a total of 62 patients (31 with LGG and 31 with HGG). The tumors were segmented by an experienced CT-scan technologist with 3D slicer software. A total of 14 shape features, 18 histogram-based features, and 75 texture-based features were computed. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) and Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) were used to evaluate and compare classification models. Results: A total of 13 out of 107 features were selected to differentiate between LGGs and HGGs and to perform various classifier algorithms with different crossvalidations. The best classifier algorithm was linear-discriminant with 93.5% accuracy, 96.77% sensitivity, 90.3% specificity, and 0.98% AUC in the differentiation of LGGs and HGGs. Conclusion: The proposed method can identify LGG and HGG with 93.5% accuracy, 96.77% sensitivity, 90.3% specificity, and 0.98% AUC, leading to the best treatment for glioma patients by using CT scans based on radiomics analysis. © Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 158
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using contrast-enhanced CT and non-contrast-enhanced CT to predict EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients—a radiomics nomogram analysis
    Xiaoyan Yang
    Min Liu
    Yanhong Ren
    Huang Chen
    Pengxin Yu
    Siyi Wang
    Rongguo Zhang
    Huaping Dai
    Chen Wang
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 2693 - 2703
  • [22] Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and clinical features of sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma
    He, Guangming
    Huang, Weiqing
    Zhou, Zhimei
    Wu, Hui
    Tian, Qin
    Tan, Lilian
    Li, Xi
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (10) : 3091 - 3100
  • [23] Contrast-enhanced CT features of hepatoblastoma: Can we predict histopathology?
    Baheti, Akshay D.
    Stanescu, A. Luana
    Li, Ning
    Chapman, Teresa
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2017, 44 : 33 - 37
  • [24] Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and clinical features of sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma
    Guangming He
    Weiqing Huang
    Zhimei Zhou
    Hui Wu
    Qin Tian
    Lilian Tan
    Xi Li
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 3091 - 3100
  • [25] The feasibility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography immediately after contrast-enhanced CT
    Okada, Nobuko
    Tatsugami, Fuminari
    Sugai, Mai
    Okita, Izumi
    Ito, Mitsuya
    Ohtani, Shoichiro
    Ichimura, Kouichi
    Urashima, Masaki
    Awai, Kazuo
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 12 (03) : 277 - 282
  • [26] The feasibility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography immediately after contrast-enhanced CT
    Nobuko Okada
    Fuminari Tatsugami
    Mai Sugai
    Izumi Okita
    Mitsuya Ito
    Shoichiro Ohtani
    Kouichi Ichimura
    Masaki Urashima
    Kazuo Awai
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2019, 12 : 277 - 282
  • [27] Using contrast-enhanced CT and non-contrast-enhanced CT to predict EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients-a radiomics nomogram analysis
    Yang, Xiaoyan
    Liu, Min
    Ren, Yanhong
    Chen, Huang
    Yu, Pengxin
    Wang, Siyi
    Zhang, Rongguo
    Dai, Huaping
    Wang, Chen
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (04) : 2693 - 2703
  • [28] The relationship between contrast-enhanced computed tomography radiomics features and mitosis karyorrhexis index in neuroblastoma
    Chen, Xin
    Wang, Haoru
    Xia, Yuwei
    Shi, Feng
    He, Ling
    Liu, Enmei
    DISCOVER ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [29] Incorporating the clinical and radiomics features of contrast-enhanced mammography to classify breast lesions: a retrospective study
    Wang, Simin
    Sun, Yuqi
    Mao, Ning
    Duan, Shaofeng
    Li, Qin
    Li, Ruimin
    Jiang, Tingting
    Wang, Zhongyi
    Xie, Haizhu
    Gu, Yajia
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2021, 11 (10) : 4418 - +
  • [30] Deep Learning Radiomics Model of Contrast-Enhanced CT for Differentiating the Primary Source of Liver Metastases
    Jia, Wenjing
    Li, Fuyan
    Cui, Yi
    Wang, Yong
    Dai, Zhengjun
    Yan, Qingqing
    Liu, Xinhui
    Li, Yuting
    Chang, Huan
    Zeng, Qingshi
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (10) : 4057 - 4067