A Perspective on Improving the Multicriteria Decision-Making Environment

被引:0
|
作者
Momeni M.A. [1 ]
Kumar S. [2 ]
Jain V. [3 ]
Mostofi A. [3 ]
Chandra C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Jam Faculty of Engineering, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr
[2] Department of Operations and Supply Chain Management, Opus College of Business, University of St. Thomas, Minneapolis, 55403, MN
[3] Victoria Business School, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn, Wellington
[4] Department of Management Studies, College of Business Administration, University of Michigan - Dearborn, Dearborn, 48128, MI
来源
IEEE Engineering Management Review | 1600年 / 49卷 / 02期
关键词
Complementary and supplementary property of criteria; dependence of criteria; inadequacy of criteria; multiple-criteria decision making;
D O I
10.1109/EMR.2021.3051661
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Organizations and managers need to consider multiple criteria when they want to evaluate or rank their available plans and alternatives. A proper decision-making process enables organizations to select and implement strategies that are more in line with their business goals and prospects. Problems arises with some issues in a complex decision-making environment, that, if not addressed adequately, can limit organizations from selecting the best and most desired alternatives. Issues include the lack of enough information about criteria, the dependence of criteria, and expert judgment inconsistency during the decision-making process. We introduce a new multicriteria decision-making model (MCDM) in this article. The model interactively modifies the inconsistent judgment of experts. The inadequacy of criteria and complementary and supplementary properties of criteria are also introduced and discussed. These items help guide how organizations and managers can utilize the model to overcome the identified decision-making problems. © 1973-2011 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 203
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Onar, Sezi Cevik
    Oztaysi, Basar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (04) : 637 - 666
  • [32] A Rough Hybrid Multicriteria Decision-Making Model for Improving the Quality of a Research Information System
    Shao, Qi-Gan
    Liou, James J. H.
    Weng, Sung-Shun
    Chuang, Yen-Ching
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2019, 11 (10):
  • [33] Multicriteria Group Decision Making in a Linguistic Environment
    Tan, Chunqiao
    Deng, Hepu
    Liu, Junyan
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, PT I, 2011, 7002 : 508 - +
  • [34] Improving multicriteria group decision making with automated decision guidance
    Limayem, M
    Chelbi, A
    SMC '97 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS - 1997 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5: CONFERENCE THEME: COMPUTATIONAL CYBERNETICS AND SIMULATION, 1997, : 1890 - 1895
  • [35] A Knowledge-Based Risk Measure From the Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Perspective
    Bao, Chunbing
    Wu, Dengsheng
    Li, Jianping
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 27 (05) : 1126 - 1138
  • [36] Multicriteria decision-making using Archimedean aggregation operators in Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy environment
    Sarkar, Arun
    Biswas, Animesh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (07) : 1361 - 1386
  • [37] DECISION-MAKING IN FUZZY ENVIRONMENT FUZZY INFORMATION AND DECISION-MAKING
    TANAKA, H
    OKUDA, T
    ASAI, K
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1977, 15 (06) : 623 - 635
  • [38] RISK ASSESSMENT FOR PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT: AN INTEGRATED MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH
    Sharma A.
    Kumar D.
    Arora N.
    Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2023, 6 (02): : 293 - 340
  • [39] On the decision-making framework for policing: A proposal for improving police decision-making
    Halford, Eric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW CRIME AND JUSTICE, 2024, 79
  • [40] SPATIAL FUZZY CONSUMERS DECISION-MAKING - A MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS
    PONSARD, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 25 (02) : 235 - 246