Performance of GPM-IMERG satellite precipitation for rainfall-runoff modeling in Indonesia

被引:2
|
作者
Hidayah, Entin [1 ]
Saifurridzal, Saifurridzal [1 ]
Wiyono, Retno Utami Agung [1 ]
Widiarti, Wiwik Yunarni [1 ]
Martini, Resa [1 ]
Juliastuti, Juliastuti [1 ]
Riduwan, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Jember Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Jember 68121, Indonesia
关键词
GPM-IMERG satellite data; HEC-HMS; Mayang; rainfall-runoff modeling; rain gauges; Thiessen polygons; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; DENSITY;
D O I
10.2166/wpt.2024.240
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Accurate discharge predictions are essential for effective water resource management, including irrigation, drinking water supply, hydropower, reservoir management, environmental flow, and flood assessment. Satellite precipitation data, such as GPM-IMERG, offers a viable solution for estimating river discharge, especially in ungauged or sparsely gauged watersheds. This study evaluates the use of GPM-IMERG data in the HEC-HMS hydrological model to predict discharge in the Mayang Watershed, Jember Regency, Indonesia. The study employs the Arithmetic, Polygon Thiessen, and Isohyet methods to analyze rainfall distribution. Results indicate that the Polygon Thiessen method, when paired with GPM-IMERG data, provides more reliable precipitation estimates due to its consideration of rain gauge proximity. Calibration and validation confirm the superiority of GPM-IMERG data over traditional observational data, particularly under high-flow conditions. Despite some limitations in detecting low-intensity precipitation, GPM-IMERG outperforms other satellite products like TRMM in terms of accuracy. Sensitivity analysis highlights the significant influence of parameters such as curve Number and time of concentration on model outcomes. Further research should explore emerging rainfall data products to improve hydrological modeling accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:3909 / 3928
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impacts of satellite-based precipitation datasets on rainfall-runoff modeling of the Western Amazon basin of Peru and Ecuador
    Zubieta, Ricardo
    Getirana, Augusto
    Espinoza, Jhan Carlo
    Lavado, Waldo
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 528 : 599 - 612
  • [22] Rainfall/runoff hydrological modeling using satellite precipitation information
    Hernandez-Romero, Paul
    Patino-Gomez, Carlos
    Martinez-Austria, Polioptro F.
    Corona-Vasquez, Benito
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 17 (05) : 1082 - 1098
  • [23] Comparing Performance of Different Loss Methods in Rainfall-Runoff Modeling
    Razmkhah, Homa
    WATER RESOURCES, 2016, 43 (01) : 207 - 224
  • [24] Comparing performance of different loss methods in rainfall-runoff modeling
    Homa Razmkhah
    Water Resources, 2016, 43 : 207 - 224
  • [25] INPUT ERRORS IN RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING
    RETNAM, MTP
    WILLIAMS, BJ
    MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 1988, 30 (1-2) : 119 - 131
  • [26] THE TANK MODEL IN RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING
    PHIEN, HN
    PRADHAN, PSS
    WATER SA, 1983, 9 (03) : 93 - 102
  • [27] Fuzzy awakening in rainfall-runoff modeling
    Sen, Z
    Altunkaynak, A
    NORDIC HYDROLOGY, 2004, 35 (01) : 31 - 43
  • [28] Historical development of rainfall-runoff modeling
    Peel, Murray C.
    McMahon, Thomas A.
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER, 2020, 7 (05):
  • [29] Rainfall-runoff modeling and hydroclimatic classification
    Bargaoui, Zoubeïda
    Dakhlaoui, Hamouda
    Houcine, Ahmed
    Revue des Sciences de l'Eau, 2008, 21 (02): : 233 - 245
  • [30] A refined method for the simulation of catchment rainfall-runoff based on satellite-precipitation downscaling
    Jian, Jihao
    He, Siming
    Liu, Wei
    Liu, Shuang
    Guo, Liping
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2025, 653