The Difference between Traditional Magnetic Stimulation and Microcoil Stimulation: Threshold and the Electric Field Gradient

被引:0
|
作者
Alzahrani, Mohammed [1 ]
Roth, Bradley J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oakland Univ, Dept Phys, Rochester, MI 48309 USA
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 18期
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; microcoil; activating function; neural excitation; IN-VITRO;
D O I
10.3390/app14188349
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This paper considers the threshold value of the activating function needed for stimulation in traditional magnetic stimulation and microcoil stimulation. Two analyses of excitation have been studied: spatial frequency analysis and active membrane analysis using the Hodgkin-Huxley model. The activating function depends on the spatial distribution of the electric field gradient in the active membrane analysis and the spatial frequency in the spatial frequency analysis. Both analyses show that a microcoil (tens of microns in size) has a higher threshold than a traditional coil (tens of millimeters in size) when the spatial frequency is large or the spatial extent of the activating function is small. Consequently, the stimulation threshold for a microcoil is much higher than that for a conventional coil.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A THEORETICAL CALCULATION OF THE ELECTRIC-FIELD INDUCED IN THE CORTEX DURING MAGNETIC STIMULATION
    ROTH, BJ
    SAYPOL, JM
    HALLETT, M
    COHEN, LG
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 81 (01): : 47 - 56
  • [42] Numerical investigation of the electric field distribution induced in the brain by transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Kim, DH
    Loukaides, N
    Sykulski, JK
    Georghiou, GE
    IEE PROCEEDINGS-SCIENCE MEASUREMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 151 (06) : 479 - 483
  • [43] Effect of Membrane Capacitance on the Induced Electric Field for the Magnetic Peripheral Nerve Stimulation
    RamRakhyani, Anil Kumar
    Kagan, Zachary B.
    Khan, Faisal
    Warren, David J.
    Normann, Richard
    Lazzi, Gianluca
    2014 USNC-URSI RADIO SCIENCE MEETING (JOINT WITH AP-S SYMPOSIUM), 2014, : 249 - 249
  • [44] Detection of a diabetic sural nerve from the magnetic field after electric stimulation
    Hayami, Takehito
    Iramina, Keiji
    Hyodo, Akira
    Chen, Xian
    Sunagawa, Kenji
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 2009, 105 (07)
  • [45] The strength and spread of the electric field induced by transcranial rotating permanent magnet stimulation in comparison with conventional transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Helekar, S. A.
    Convento, S.
    Nguyen, L.
    John, B. S.
    Patel, A.
    Yau, J. M.
    Voss, H. U.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2018, 309 : 153 - 160
  • [46] CAUDATE STIMULATION AND RETROGRADE-AMNESIA - AMNESIA THRESHOLD AND GRADIENT
    GOLD, PE
    KING, RA
    BEHAVIORAL BIOLOGY, 1972, 7 (05): : 709 - &
  • [47] Analysis from a stimulation perspective of the field patterns of magnetic resonance imaging gradient coils
    Nyenhuis, JA
    Bourland, JD
    Schaefer, DJ
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1997, 81 (08) : 4314 - 4316
  • [48] Multichannel recording and isolated stimulation system for chronic electric field stimulation in rats
    Chernyy, N
    Peixoto, N
    Sunderam, S
    Mason, JP
    Weinstein, SJ
    Schiff, SJ
    Gluckman, BJ
    EPILEPSIA, 2005, 46 : 283 - 284
  • [49] Electric stimulation of magnetoplasticity and magnetic hardening in crystals
    Al'shits, V. I.
    Darinskaya, E. V.
    Koldaeva, M. V.
    Petrzhik, E. A.
    JETP LETTERS, 2008, 88 (07) : 428 - 434
  • [50] A THEORETICAL COMPARISON OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE BRAIN
    SAYPOL, JM
    ROTH, BJ
    COHEN, LG
    HALLETT, M
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1991, 19 (03) : 317 - 328