Distributed quantized detection fusion method independent of underwater acoustic sensor′s signal-to-noise ratio

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Jinhu [1 ]
Feng, Xi'an [1 ]
Qiao, Lu [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Marine Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi′an,710072, China
关键词
Alarm systems;
D O I
10.11990/jheu.202303033
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To meet the needs of signal detection and fusion in underwater cross-platform collaborative systems, a new distributed quantized detection fusion method is proposed. This method is independent of prior information on the acoustic sensor′s signal-to-noise ratio. It not only enhances the performance of the detection fusion system but also avoids the need to know the signal-to-noise ratio of each sensor. First, using the Neyman-Pearson criterion, we derive the globally optimal algorithm for quantized detection fusion. This algorithm ensures that the detection fusion system meets the false alarm probability requirements. By jointly designing the detection fusion rules and individual sensor decision rules, we achieve the optimal decision for multiple quantized judgments. Subsequently, we introduce a suboptimal algorithm for quantized detection fusion. In this algorithm, the fusion center decision threshold and sensor decision thresholds are designed to depend only on the false alarm probability closely related to noise variance rather than the signal-to-noise ratio. This simplifies the process by using independent fusion rules and sensor decision rules. Finally, computer simulations show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the detection capabilities of individual sensors participating in fusion and globally optimal hard-decision fusion. The performance of the suboptimal quantized detection fusion algorithm closely matches that of the globally optimal quantized detection fusion algorithm. © 2024 Editorial Board of Journal of Harbin Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2143 / 2149
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] LESION DETECTION AND SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO IN CT IMAGES
    JUDY, PF
    SWENSSON, RG
    SZULC, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1981, 8 (01) : 13 - 23
  • [32] Detection of the number of sources at low signal-to-noise ratio
    Gu, J.-F.
    Wei, P.
    Tai, H.-M.
    IET SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2007, 1 (01) : 2 - 8
  • [33] The EKT method theoretical signal-to-noise ratio expression
    Fouda, J. S. Armand Eyebe
    Kom, Martin
    Domngang, Samuel
    DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2007, 17 (04) : 808 - 818
  • [34] Analysis of the signal-to-noise ratio in the optical differentiation wavefront sensor
    Oti, JE
    Canales, VF
    Cagigal, MP
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2003, 11 (21): : 2783 - 2790
  • [35] THEORETICAL BASIS OF A METHOD FOR MEASURING SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO
    GINZBURG, VV
    GIRSHOV, VS
    LESMAN, MY
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND RADIO ENGINEERING, 1977, 31-2 (07) : 115 - 118
  • [36] Newly Developed Method of Signal-to-Noise Ratio Estimation
    Yankevych, Roman
    2015 16th International Conference on Computational Problems of Electrical Engineering (CPEE), 2015, : 233 - 235
  • [37] A method for realistic, conversational signal-to-noise ratio estimation
    Mansour, Naim
    Marschall, Marton
    May, Tobias
    Westermann, Adam
    Dau, Torsten
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2021, 149 (03): : 1559 - 1566
  • [38] Bayesian Sequential Joint Signal Detection and Signal-to-Noise Ratio Estimation
    Reinhard, Dominik
    Fauss, Michael
    Zoubir, Ahdelhak M.
    2019 27TH EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO), 2019,
  • [39] High Signal-to-Noise Ratio MEMS Noise Listener for Ship Noise Detection
    Zhu, Shan
    Zhang, Guojun
    Wu, Daiyue
    Jia, Li
    Zhang, Yifan
    Geng, Yanan
    Liu, Yan
    Ren, Weirong
    Zhang, Wendong
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [40] A micromachined, high signal-to-noise ratio, acoustic emission sensor and its application to monitor dynamic wear
    Feng, Guo-Hua
    Tsai, Ming-Yiang
    Jeng, Yeau-Ren
    SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2012, 188 : 56 - 65