State-of-the-art nonstationary hypersurface damage assessment approach for energy harvesters

Since EH (Energy Harvesters) constitute nowadays a vital part of renewable energy engineering, experimental research is required in addition to numerical modeling, serving reliable structural design and ensuring prolonged device service time. The performance of GPEH (GalloPing EH) has been examined in this case study, utilizing comprehensive laboratory wind tunnel tests, carried out under realistic windspeed conditions. Novel structural multivariate risks assessment methodology, presented here, being feasible for nonstationary nonlinear GPEH dynamic systems, that had been either physically measured over a representative period, providing jointly quasiergodic time-series, or directly numerically MCS (Monte Carlo Simulated). Based on laboratory-measured GPEH dynamics, the presented analysis demonstrates that the proposed multivariate hypersurface methodology offers robust predictions of the structural failure/damage risks. Furthermore, when dealing with raw measured timeseries, representing the high-dimensional dynamic system, existing risk assessment techniques struggle to handle nonlinear inter-correlations between GPEH critical components. This case study's main objective has been to validate and benchmark the novel multimodal risk assessment methodology, which utilizes multivariate nonstationary lab-recorded time histories to extract relevant design information from the underlying GPEH dynamics. The proposed state-of-the-art nonstationary hypersurface reliability approach being of a generic nature, offering additional capacity for damage/failure risks prognostics for a wide range of nonlinear multidimensional nonstationary systems. Forecasted damage and failure risks have been supplied with confidence bands, demonstrating the experimental setup's robustness, as well as the useful design features of the presented nonstationary hypersurface risks assessment methodology. It should be noted that the presented reliability methodology being mathematically exact, and it does not rely on simplifying assumptions.