Estimating the location and diameter of tree roots using ground penetrating radar

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Zepeng [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaowei [1 ]
Xue, Fangxiu [1 ]
Wen, Jian [1 ]
Han, Hongyan [2 ]
Huang, Ying [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing,100083, China
[2] The Summer Palace Management Office, Beijing,100091, China
来源
Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering | 2021年 / 37卷 / 08期
关键词
Geological surveys - Nondestructive examination - Radar clutter - Soil testing - Geophysical prospecting - Ground penetrating radar systems - Image enhancement - Clustering algorithms - Clutter (information theory) - Forecasting - Forestry - Image segmentation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Non-destructive testing of tree roots can contribute to explore the interaction between plant roots and soil. Currently, ground penetrating radar (GPR) can make it possible to non-destructively measure tree roots. However, the complex images from GPR are difficult to parse, due to the low automation level and accuracy. In this study, an automatic estimation of root and diameter was proposed using YOLOv3 to realize the intelligent recognition and extraction of root reflection hyperbola region of interest (ROI). Image processing such as histogram equalization was applied to improve the difference between the hyperbola and background, thereby to optimize the dataset of edge detection. Random Hough transform (RHT) with strong anti-clutter interference was used to realize the precise positioning of the apex of the hyperbola. A Savizky-Golay filter was introduced to smooth the discrete sequence of GPR one-dimensional data (A-scan), thereby to improve the prediction accuracy of root diameter. A diameter estimation was addressed for the distribution of two positions of hyperbola vertex in A-scan data. A root embedding field test was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of models, further to determine the influence of root diameter, buried depth, and orientation in three dimensions on the parameter prediction of root system. The total average relative error of root position and diameter was within 10.57% in all experiments. All embedded roots were accurately identified in the test of root diameter, where the average relative errors of diameter, X- and Y-position were 16.04%, 2.22%, and 4.81%, respectively. The embedded roots at different depths were also accurately identified in the test of root buried depth. The apex of the hyperbola was still accurately located in the test, although there was a little interference from clutter. The vertical positioning was corrected through multiple sets of GPR two-dimensional data (B-scan), when the root was tilted along the vertical direction in the root orientation test. The recognition precision and recall rate reached 96.62% and 86.94%, respectively. The average detection time was 40ms for a single image. A better performance was achieved to identify the thick roots in the field test, compared with the threshold segmentation. In addition, two influencing factors were determined to improve the data accuracy, including the soil and root moisture content. Three influencing factors were determined for the predicted accuracy, including the training degree of network model, the image processing, and the RHT threshold. Finally, the improvement strategy was given in the future research. The experimental and analytical results demonstrated that the proposed method can automatically extract the ROI of root reflection hyperbola, further to locate accurately the hyperbola vertex, and finally to replace manual calibration and interpretation. The finding can make a great contribution to the practical exploration for the root location and diameter prediction in the non-destructive testing of tree roots. © 2021, Editorial Department of the Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 168
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] BCD using ground penetrating radar techniques
    Flores-Tapia, D
    Thomas, G
    Noghanian, S
    Poyvasi, M
    Pistorius, S
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2005, 4 (02) : 185 - 192
  • [42] Avalanche rescue using ground penetrating radar
    Modroo, JJ
    Olhoeft, GR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GROUND PENETRATING RADAR, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 785 - 788
  • [43] Detection of landmines using ground penetrating radar
    Zoubir, AM
    Iskander, DR
    Chant, I
    Carevic, D
    DETECTION AND REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MINES AND MINELIKE TARGETS IV, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3710 : 1301 - 1312
  • [44] Landmine detection using a ground penetrating radar
    Uschkerat, U
    FREQUENZ, 2002, 56 (11-12) : 258 - 263
  • [45] Applications and frustrations in using ground penetrating radar
    Olhoeft, GR
    IEEE AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2002, 17 (02) : 12 - 20
  • [46] A Novel Method of Hyperbola Recognition in Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) B-Scan Image for Tree Roots Detection
    Zhang, Xiaowei
    Xue, Fangxiu
    Wang, Zepeng
    Wen, Jian
    Guan, Cheng
    Wang, Feng
    Han, Ling
    Ying, Na
    FORESTS, 2021, 12 (08):
  • [47] Estimating vadose zone hydraulic properties using ground penetrating radar: The impact of prior information
    Scholer, Marie
    Irving, James
    Binley, Andrew
    Holliger, Klaus
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2011, 47
  • [48] Estimating the Depth of Buried Radioactive Sources using Ground Penetrating Radar and a Gamma Ray Detector
    Ukaegbu, Ikechukwu K.
    Aspinall, Michael
    Gamage, Kelum A. A.
    2019 USNC-URSI RADIO SCIENCE MEETING (JOINT WITH AP-S SYMPOSIUM), 2019, : 99 - 100
  • [49] Estimating winter ebullition bubble volume in lake ice using ground-penetrating radar
    Fantello, Nadia
    Parsekian, Andrew D.
    Anthony, Katey M. Walter
    GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 83 (02) : H13 - H25
  • [50] Ground Penetrating Radar
    Siddique, Mansoor-Ul-Hassan
    MABE 09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2009, : 51 - 54