Steady-State Response Analysis of an Uncertain Rotor Based on Chebyshev Orthogonal Polynomials

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Bensheng [1 ]
Ning, Peijie [1 ]
Wang, Guang [1 ]
Zang, Chaoping [2 ]
机构
[1] Guilin Univ Aerosp Technol, Sch Aeronaut, Guilin 541004, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Energy & Power Engn, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 22期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
uncertainty analysis; Chebyshev orthogonal polynomials; sparse-grid integration method; rotor system; DYNAMIC-RESPONSE; INTERVAL-ANALYSIS; PARAMETERS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/app142210698
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The performance of a rotor system is influenced by various design parameters that are neither precise nor constant. Uncertainties in rotor operation arise from factors such as assembly errors, material defects, and wear. To obtain more reliable analytical results, it is essential to consider these uncertainties when evaluating rotor performance. In this paper, the Chebyshev interval method is employed to quantify the uncertainty in the steady-state response of the rotor system. To address the challenges of high-dimensional integration, an innovative sparse-grid integration method is introduced and demonstrated using a rotor tester. The effects of support stiffness, mass imbalance, and uncertainties in the installation phase angle on the steady-state response of the rotor system are analyzed individually, along with a comprehensive assessment of their combined effects. When compared to the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) method and the full tensor product grid (FTG) method, the proposed method requires only 68% of the computational cost associated with MCS, while maintaining calculation accuracy. Additionally, sparse-grid integration reduces the computational cost by approximately 95.87% compared to the FTG method.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Instrumentation, testing and analysis of electric machine rotor steady-state heating
    Dymond, J
    Ong, R
    Stranges, N
    INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS SOCIETY 48TH ANNUAL PETROLEUM AND CHEMICAL INDUSTRY CONFERENCE, 2001, : 297 - 303
  • [22] Instrumentation, testing, and analysis of electric machine rotor steady-state heating
    Dymond, JH
    Ong, R
    Stranges, N
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2002, 38 (06) : 1661 - 1667
  • [23] Steady-State Response of a Rotor Excited by Combined Rotational and Translational Base Motions
    Dakel, M.
    Baguet, S.
    Dufour, R.
    VIBRATION PROBLEMS, ICOVP 2011, SUPPLEMENT, 2011, : 395 - 400
  • [24] EFFICIENT NUMERICAL COMPUTATION OF THE STEADY-STATE RESPONSE AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF THE ROTOR SYSTEMS WITH SQUEEZE FILM DAMPERS
    Molcan, M.
    Ferfecki, P.
    Zapomel, J.
    ENGINEERING MECHANICS 2020 (IM2020), 2020, : 354 - 357
  • [25] Numerical analysis and experiment of counter-rotating dual-rotor's steady-state response
    Hu, Xuan
    Luo, Gui-Huo
    Gao, De-Ping
    Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power, 2007, 22 (07): : 1044 - 1049
  • [26] Auditory steady-state response
    Mühler, R
    HNO, 2004, 52 (09) : 779 - 782
  • [27] STEADY-STATE STEERING RESPONSE
    THOMPSON, AG
    VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 1977, 6 (01) : 37 - 40
  • [28] STEADY-STATE ANALYSIS OF ONE TYPE OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS BY CHEBYSHEV FUNCTION TECHNIQUE.
    Duvanenko, V.V.
    Electronic modeling, 1981, (05): : 837 - 842
  • [29] Method of Machine Learning Based on Discrete Orthogonal Polynomials of Chebyshev
    Puleko, Igor
    Kravchenko, Svetlana
    Chumakevych, Victor
    Ptashnyk, Vadym
    COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (COLINS 2020), VOL I: MAIN CONFERENCE, 2020, 2604
  • [30] Prediction method for steady-state response of local rubbing blade-rotor systems
    Qian Zhao
    Hongliang Yao
    Qi Xu
    Bangchun Wen
    Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2015, 29 : 1537 - 1545