Sustainability assessment of community-based water supply projects: A multi-criteria decision approach

被引:6
|
作者
Ankon S.B. [1 ]
Nishat E.A. [1 ]
Riana M.M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi
关键词
Analytical hierarchy process; Community-based projects of water supply; Developing countries; Multi-criteria decision framework; Sustainability assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100849
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In developing countries, Community-based projects of water supply (CBWS) are implemented rapidly as an improved solution to rural water supply systems. However, sustainability has been a major concern for these projects. Analytical hierarchy process, a Multi-criteria decision framework is used in this study to evaluate the sustainability of four types of community-based water supply schemes and compare the results to focus on the relative performance of each type, analyze the drawbacks and thus bring about necessary modifications in decision making for the stakeholders. 57 quantifiable sub-criteria were identified and weighted to model the hierarchy structure under Environmental, Economic and Social criteria of sustainability. Several supply sources belonging to those 4 CBWS types were inspected to be scored for the 57 sub-criteria. The median of the scores of the sources under each type was taken as the score of that type. Data were collected by Household Survey, Site Survey, In-Person interviews, Expert Opinion and Observation. The study results show that supply sources that run under private ownership and operation having more than 100 users show the best sustainability score. Much attention is needed to sources that are owned and operated by the government solely. The completeness of the study made a robust baseline that can identify strategies and suggest efficient management in similar rural community-based water supply projects. © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Role of weights in multi-criteria decision aid, and the ranking of water projects in Jordan
    Staffordshire Univ, Stafford, United Kingdom
    Eur J Oper Res, 2 (278-288):
  • [32] The role of weights in multi-criteria decision aid, and the ranking of water projects in Jordan
    AlKloub, B
    AlShemmeri, T
    Pearman, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 99 (02) : 278 - 288
  • [33] Evaluation of supply sustainability of vaccine alternatives with multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Yazici, Emre
    Uner, Sabire Irem
    Demir, Asli
    Dinler, Sevda
    Alakas, Haci Mehmet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 37 (04): : 2421 - 2444
  • [34] Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Ruan, Da
    MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2008, 77 (5-6) : 464 - 475
  • [35] A multi-criteria decision-making framework for building sustainability assessment in Kazakhstan
    Akhanova, Gulzhanat
    Nadeem, Abid
    Kim, Jong R.
    Azhar, Salman
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 52
  • [36] Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for transport projects evaluation in Istanbul
    Karsak, EE
    Ahiska, SS
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2005, VOL 4, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3483 : 301 - 311
  • [37] Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Sustainability and Value Assessment in Early PSS Design
    Bertoni, Marco
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (07)
  • [38] Assessment of the Sustainability of a Real Estate Project Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Dobrovolskiene, Nomeda
    Pozniak, Anastasija
    Tvaronaviciene, Manuela
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [39] Fuzzy model in the vulnerability multi-criteria assessment in water supply systems
    Zidko, Veruska
    Ramos, Helena M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL HYDRAULICS: THEORETICAL, EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPUTATIONAL SOLUTIONS, 2010, : 323 - 326
  • [40] Cost Analysis of Water Quality Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Moosavian, Seyed Farhan
    Borzuei, Daryoosh
    Ahmadi, Abolfazl
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36 (12) : 4843 - 4862