Sustainability assessment of community-based water supply projects: A multi-criteria decision approach

被引:6
|
作者
Ankon S.B. [1 ]
Nishat E.A. [1 ]
Riana M.M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi
关键词
Analytical hierarchy process; Community-based projects of water supply; Developing countries; Multi-criteria decision framework; Sustainability assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100849
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In developing countries, Community-based projects of water supply (CBWS) are implemented rapidly as an improved solution to rural water supply systems. However, sustainability has been a major concern for these projects. Analytical hierarchy process, a Multi-criteria decision framework is used in this study to evaluate the sustainability of four types of community-based water supply schemes and compare the results to focus on the relative performance of each type, analyze the drawbacks and thus bring about necessary modifications in decision making for the stakeholders. 57 quantifiable sub-criteria were identified and weighted to model the hierarchy structure under Environmental, Economic and Social criteria of sustainability. Several supply sources belonging to those 4 CBWS types were inspected to be scored for the 57 sub-criteria. The median of the scores of the sources under each type was taken as the score of that type. Data were collected by Household Survey, Site Survey, In-Person interviews, Expert Opinion and Observation. The study results show that supply sources that run under private ownership and operation having more than 100 users show the best sustainability score. Much attention is needed to sources that are owned and operated by the government solely. The completeness of the study made a robust baseline that can identify strategies and suggest efficient management in similar rural community-based water supply projects. © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the Sustainability of Community-Based Long-Term Care Programmes: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach
    Song, Baoan
    Sun, Qiyu
    Li, Ying
    Que, Chuanqi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (07):
  • [2] Evaluation of electricity supply sustainability and security: Multi-criteria decision analysis approach
    Ren, Jingzheng
    Dong, Liang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 438 - 453
  • [3] Sustainability assessment of products based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis
    Chunhua Feng
    Yunfei Mai
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85 : 695 - 710
  • [4] Sustainability assessment of products based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis
    Feng, Chunhua
    Mai, Yunfei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (1-4): : 695 - 710
  • [5] Teaching Multi-Criteria Decision Making Based on Sustainability Factors Applied to Road Projects
    Paredes, Gabriela
    Herrera, Rodrigo F.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (21) : 1 - 25
  • [6] Review of multi-criteria decision aid for integrated sustainability assessment of urban water systems
    Lai, E.
    Lundie, S.
    Ashbolt, N. J.
    URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2008, 5 (04) : 315 - 327
  • [7] Sustainability Assessment of Concepts for Energetic Use of Biomass: A Multi-Criteria Decision Support Approach
    Lerche, Nils
    Schmehl, Meike
    Geldermann, Jutta
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH PROCEEDINGS 2012, 2014, : 77 - 82
  • [8] Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation in Niger Using a Weighted Multi-Criteria Decision Approach
    Bhandari, Ramchandra
    Arce, Benjamin Eduardo
    Sessa, Vittorio
    Adamou, Rabani
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [9] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for hospital sustainability performance assessment
    Gokler, Seda Hatice
    Boran, Semra
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [10] Sustainability assessment of groundwater remediation technologies based on multi-criteria decision making method
    An, Da
    Xi, Beidou
    Ren, Jingzheng
    Wang, Yue
    Jia, Xiaoping
    He, Chang
    Li, Zhiwei
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 119 : 36 - 46