Energy conservation also yields: Capital, operations, recognition, and environmental benefits

被引:0
|
作者
Woodroof, Eric [1 ]
Turner, Wayne [2 ]
Heffington, Warren [3 ]
Capehart, Barney [4 ]
机构
[1] Best Practices of Energy and Carbon Management, United States
[2] Industrial Engineering and Management, Oklahoma State University, United States
[3] Texas A and M University, United States
[4] Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
关键词
Conservation projects - Environmental benefits - Facility managers - Material cost - Saving energy - Site-specific;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous research indicates there are additional (often unreported) benefits from saving energy.1,2 This article identifies these additional benefits and describes how to calculate their value.3,4 In addition, we found that a high percentage of facility managers experienced some of these benefits. For example, in a recent survey 92% of facility managers experienced reduced maintenance material costs as a result of energy conservation (primarily because lights, filters, and other equipment lasted longer when operated less hours per year). Due to site-specific factors, not all facility managers will experience every benefit, however a high percentage of respondents (92%, 71%, and 63%) did experience three of the six additional benefits in the survey. Because facility managers do receive some of these additional benefits, we developed two approaches to quantify their value. When applicable, these benefits should yield a direct and verifiable dollar savings a majority of the time. Via a simple example, we calculated these benefits to be worth approximately 31% of additional value beyond the direct energy dollar savings (and that was only applying half of the possible benefits). There are other benefits that defy quantification, some of which we list at the end of the article for use in future research and when evaluating energy conservation projects and programs.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Energy conservation by optimising operations and implementing energy saving ideas
    Ballarpur Industries Ltd., Unit : Ballarpur, P. O. Ballarpur Paper Mills, Dist. Chandrapur- 442901,
    IPPTA, 2006, 3 (71-75):
  • [22] Solutions to the double burden of malnutrition also generate health and environmental benefits
    Emiliano Lopez Barrera
    Thomas Hertel
    Nature Food, 2023, 4 : 616 - 624
  • [23] Solutions to the double burden of malnutrition also generate health and environmental benefits
    Lopez Barrera, Emiliano
    Hertel, Thomas
    NATURE FOOD, 2023, 4 (07): : 616 - +
  • [24] ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC COSTS OF SOIL EROSION AND CONSERVATION BENEFITS
    PIMENTEL, D
    HARVEY, C
    RESOSUDARMO, P
    SINCLAIR, K
    KURZ, D
    MCNAIR, M
    CRIST, S
    SHPRITZ, L
    FITTON, L
    SAFFOURI, R
    BLAIR, R
    SCIENCE, 1995, 267 (5201) : 1117 - 1123
  • [25] Environmental Conservation and Social Benefits of Charcoal Production in Mozambique
    Zorrilla-Miras, Pedro
    Mahamane, Mansour
    Metzger, Marc J.
    Baumert, Sophia
    Vollmer, Frank
    Luz, Ana Catarina
    Woollen, Emily
    Sitoe, Almeida A.
    Patenaude, Genevieve
    Nhantumbo, Isilda
    Ryan, Casey M.
    Paterson, James
    Matediane, Maria Julieta
    Ribeiro, Natasha Sofia
    Grundy, Isla M.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 144 : 100 - 111
  • [26] Costs and environmental benefits of watershed conservation and restoration in Taiwan
    Lin, Jen-Yang
    Chen, Ying-Chu
    Chang, Cherng-Tzong
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 142
  • [27] NET BENEFITS OF ENERGY-CONSERVATION IN HOUSING
    CONTI, F
    MAINERI, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 1980, 4 (03) : 253 - 265
  • [28] US energy conservation and efficiency: Benefits and costs
    Pimentel D.
    Pleasant A.
    Barron J.
    Gaudioso J.
    Pollock N.
    Chae E.
    Kim Y.
    Lassiter A.
    Schiavoni C.
    Jackson A.
    Lee M.
    Eaton A.
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2004, 6 (3) : 279 - 305
  • [29] Measuring environmental benefits of conservation practices: The conservation effects assessment project.
    Bucks, DA
    Weltz, M
    Shafer, D
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 228 : U105 - U105
  • [30] Analysis of spatial heterogeneity and driving factors of capital allocation efficiency in energy conservation and environmental protection industry under environmental regulation
    Geng, Chengxuan
    Cui, Zongying
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 137