Comparison between dilatancy onset and peak of different rocks

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] [1,Hou, Wen-Shi
[2] Li, Shou-Ding
[3] Li, Xiao
[4] He, Jian-Ming
[5] Pan, Long
[6] 1,Liu, Yan-Hui
[7] Wang, Rui-Qing
来源
Hou, W.-S. (houwens@163.com) | 1600年 / Chinese Society of Civil Engineering卷 / 35期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
17
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Responsive Neurostimulation System Efficacy Between Different Electrographic Seizure Onset Patterns
    Henriquez-Rojas, Paulina
    Torabi, Tara
    Farooque, Pue
    Hirsch, Lawrence
    Duckrow, Robert
    Herlopian, Aline
    Spencer, Dennis
    Gerrard, Jason
    Quraishi, Imran
    NEUROLOGY, 2020, 94 (15)
  • [32] STRAIN BEHAVIOR OF ROCKS DURING DILATANCY-INDUCED FRACTURING
    ZARETSKYFEOKTISTOV, GG
    TANOV, GN
    IZVESTIYA AKADEMII NAUK SSSR FIZIKA ZEMLI, 1987, (10): : 35 - 40
  • [33] CREEP AND TIME-DEPENDENT DILATANCY OF ROCKS AT LARGE DEPTHS
    TAN, TK
    WU, HQ
    ROCK AT GREAT DEPTH, VOL 1: ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK PHYSICS AT GREAT DEPTH, 1989, : 67 - 76
  • [34] LOCKED IN STRESSES, CREEP AND DILATANCY OF ROCKS, AND CONSTITUTIVE-EQUATIONS
    TAN, T
    KANG, W
    ROCK MECHANICS, 1980, 13 (01): : 5 - 22
  • [35] DILATANCY-RELATED ELECTRICAL-RESISTIVITY CHANGES IN ROCKS
    BRACE, WF
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1974, 55 (12): : 1195 - 1196
  • [36] DILATANCY-RELATED ELECTRICAL-RESISTIVITY CHANGES IN ROCKS
    BRACE, WF
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1975, 113 (1-2) : 207 - 217
  • [37] Stress–dilatancy behavior of cemented sand: comparison between bonding provided by cement and biocement
    Lei Wang
    Jian Chu
    Shifan Wu
    Hao Wang
    Acta Geotechnica, 2021, 16 : 1441 - 1456
  • [39] A theoretical derivation of the dilatancy equation for brittle rocks based on Maxwell model
    Jie Li
    Houxu Huang
    Mingyang Wang
    Acta Geophysica, 2017, 65 : 55 - 64
  • [40] DYNAMIC ROLE OF DILATANCY IN THE MIGRATION AND ACCUMULATION OF OIL IN METAMORPHIC ROCKS - AN HYPOTHESIS
    MCNAUGHTON, DA
    AAPG BULLETIN-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS, 1952, 36 (05): : 912 - 912