It Didn't Sound Good with My Cochlear Implants

被引:0
|
作者
Blair J. [1 ]
Abdullah S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State University, University Park
关键词
Accessibility; Conversational Agents; Deaf; Hearing Loss; Smart Assistants; Voice Interfaces;
D O I
10.1145/3432194
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
How do deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) individuals use smart assistants (SAs)? Does the prominent use of voice interfaces in most SAs pose unique challenges for DHH users? In this work, we aim to answer these questions by conducting 4 in-depth interviews, as well as collecting survey data from 73 DHH individuals. Our findings show that individuals, even with profound deafness, can leverage SAs to accomplish complex daily tasks. However, we also identified a number of common challenges DHH individuals face when interacting with SAs (e.g., high pitch used in the default SA voice interfaces can be incompatible with hearing aids, difficulty using mobile SAs in public places with loud background noise). Based on these insights, we provide a set of suggestions for designing SAs that can better accommodate a wide range of hearing abilities. Specifically, SAs should provide more customization options to allow the user to tailor their SA to meet their hearing needs over time. For example, using a pitch-frequency test feature, much like audiograms conducted by audiologists, could allow users to calibrate their SA's voice to fit within their optimal range. We also see a need to provide more clear and actionable error messages conveyed beyond audio notifications, such as more meaningful light notifications these recommendations and findings provide the first step forward toward a more inclusive SA by addressing accessibility needs unique to this group. © 2020 ACM.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] En route to sound coding strategies for optical cochlear implants
    Khurana, Lakshay
    Harczos, Tamas
    Moser, Tobias
    Jablonski, Lukasz
    ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (10)
  • [22] Sound localising ability in children with bilateral sequential cochlear implants
    Strom-Roum, Henrik
    Rodvik, Arne K.
    Osnes, Terje A.
    Fagerland, Morten W.
    Wie, Ona B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 76 (09) : 1245 - 1248
  • [23] A new sound coding strategy for suppressing noise in cochlear implants
    Hu, Yi
    Loizou, Philipos C.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2008, 124 (01): : 498 - 509
  • [24] CILAB - a PC based laboratory sound processor for cochlear implants
    Mitterbacher, A
    Lampacher, P
    Zierhofer, C
    Hochmair, E
    BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2004, 49 (06): : 146 - 152
  • [25] Cochlear implants - Talk not only better, but also sound better
    Kramer, Elena
    SPRACHE-STIMME-GEHOR, 2014, 38 (01): : 9 - 9
  • [26] Effect of sound processing on performance of young children with cochlear implants
    Osberger, MJ
    Koch, DB
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, 2004, 1273 : 7 - 10
  • [27] Sound localization ability of young children with bilateral cochlear implants
    Beijen, Jan-Willem
    Snik, Ad F. M.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2007, 28 (04) : 479 - 485
  • [28] Development of Sound Localization Strategies in Children with Bilateral Cochlear Implants
    Zheng, Yi
    Godar, Shelly P.
    Litovsky, Ruth Y.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [29] HARMONIC COHERENT DEMODULATION FOR IMPROVING SOUND CODING IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
    Li, Xing
    Nie, Kaibao
    Atlas, Les
    Rubinstein, Jay
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, : 5462 - 5465
  • [30] IMPROVING CHANNEL SELECTION OF SOUND CODING ALGORITHMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
    Ali, Hussnain
    Hong, Feng
    Hansen, John H. L.
    Tobey, Emily
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2014,