Effect of different implant configurations on biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported mandibular monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses

被引:0
|
作者
Zhong, Jingxiao [1 ]
Guazzato, Massimiliano [2 ]
Chen, Junning [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Zhongpu [4 ]
Sun, Guangyong [1 ,5 ]
Huo, Xintao [5 ]
Liu, Xinglong [5 ]
Ahmad, Rohana [6 ]
Li, Qing [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, University of Sydney, Australia
[2] Discipline of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Westmead Centre for Oral Health, Westmead Hospital, Australia
[3] College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, United Kingdom
[4] School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Penrith,NSW,2751, Australia
[5] State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacture for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha,410082, China
[6] Unit of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sg Buloh,47000, Malaysia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Clinical research - Dental prostheses - Zirconia - Failure (mechanical) - Stress analysis - Biomechanics - Stress concentration - Finite element method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mechanical failure of zirconia-based full-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FAFDPs) remains a critical issue in prosthetic dentistry. The option of full-arch implant treatment and the biomechanical behaviour within a sophisticated screw-retained prosthetic structure have stimulated considerable interest in fundamental and clinical research. This study aimed to analyse the biomechanical responses of zirconia-based FAFDPs with different implant configurations (numbers and distributions), thereby predicting the possible failure sites and the optimum configuration from biomechanical aspect by using finite element method (FEM). Five 3D finite element (FE) models were constructed with patient-specific heterogeneous material properties of mandibular bone. The results were reported using volume-averaged von-Mises stresses (σVMVA) to eliminate numerical singularities. It was found that wider placement of multi-unit copings was preferred as it reduces the cantilever effect on denture. Within the limited areas of implant insertion, the adoption of angled multi-unit abutments allowed the insertion of oblique implants in the bone and wider distribution of the multi-unit copings in the prosthesis, leading to lower stress concentration on both mandibular bone and prosthetic components. Increasing the number of supporting implants in a FAFDPs reduced loading on each implant, although it may not necessarily reduce the stress concentration in the most posterior locations significantly. Overall, the 6-implant configuration was a preferable configuration as it provided the most balanced mechanical performance in this patient-specific case. © 2019
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of different implant configurations on biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported mandibular monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses
    Zhong, Jingxiao
    Guazzato, Massimiliano
    Chen, Junning
    Zhang, Zhongpu
    Sun, Guangyong
    Huo, Xintao
    Liu, Xinglong
    Ahmad, Rohana
    Li, Qing
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2020, 102
  • [2] Full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: An updated systematic review
    AlTarawneh, Sandra
    Thalji, Ghadeer
    Cooper, Lyndon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2021, 14 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [3] The influence of bone quality on the biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses
    Faverani, Leonardo Perez
    Ricardo Barao, Valentim Adelino
    Ramalho-Ferreira, Gabriel
    Delben, Juliana Aparecida
    Ferreira, Mayara Barbosa
    Garcia Junior, Idelmo Rangel
    Assuncao, Wirley Goncalves
    MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2014, 37 : 164 - 170
  • [4] Retrospective Cohort Evaluation of Full-Arch Zirconia Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses
    Al-Tarawneh, Sandra
    Thalji, Ghadeer
    Shonberg, David
    Fayz, Lily
    Cooper, Lyndon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2023, 38 (02) : 381 - +
  • [5] Biomechanical behavior of titanium and zirconia frameworks for implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prosthesis
    Tiossi, Rodrigo
    Gomes, Erica Alves
    Lapria Faria, Adriana Claudia
    Silveira Rodrigues, Renata Cristina
    Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (05) : 860 - 866
  • [6] BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF FULL-ARCH IMPLANT-SUPPORTED REHABILITATIONS WITH DIFFERENT DESIGNS
    Barahona, Maria Ines
    Campos, Jose Reis
    Ramos, Nuno Viriato
    Vaz, Mario
    Figueiral, Maria Helena
    Correia, Andre
    M2D2015: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICS AND MATERIALS IN DESIGN, 2015, : 1475 - 1480
  • [7] A Comparison Between Fixed and Removable Mandibular Implant-Supported Full-Arch Prostheses: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Tsigarida, Alexandra
    Chochlidakis, Konstantinos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2021, 34 : S85 - S92
  • [8] Strain Behavior of Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prostheses Supported by Four or Five Implants
    Sbardelotto, Cristian
    Lapria Faria, Adriana Claudia
    Tiossi, Rodrigo
    Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria
    Silveira Rodrigues, Renata Cristina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2022, 37 (01) : 153 - 158
  • [9] Complications of Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic Prostheses
    Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ignacio
    deLlanos-Lanchares, Hector
    Brizuela-Velasco, Aritza
    Alvarez-Riesgo, Jose-Antonio
    Llorente-Pendas, Santiago
    Herrero-Climent, Mariano
    Alvarez-Arenal, Angel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (12) : 1 - 23
  • [10] Rationale for a fixed implant-supported transitional prosthesis in full-arch implant restorations
    Leclercq, P.
    Dohan, D. M.
    REVUE DE STOMATOLOGIE DE CHIRURGIE MAXILLO-FACIALE ET DE CHIRURGIE ORALE, 2007, 108 (06) : 530 - 535