Open access: The whipping boy for problems in scholarly communication—A response to the rebuttals

被引:0
|
作者
Kingsley, Danny A. [1 ,2 ]
Kennan, Mary Anne [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, Australian National University, Australia
[2] Cambridge University, United Kingdom
[3] School of Information Studies, Charles Stuart University, Australia
[4] School of Information Systems, Technology and Management, University of New South Wales, Australia
关键词
Information use - Libraries - Publishing - Information services;
D O I
10.17705/1cais.03720
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we respond to five rebuttals to Kingsley and Kennan (2015). Four researchers in the information systems field and a university library director of research infrastructure provided these rebuttals. Almost without exception, the rebuttals from the information systems researchers take an analytical approach to the question of scholarly communication in their field. However, in undertaking their individual analyses of scholarly publishing or communication, they do not directly address the issues raised in our original debate piece. The rebuttal from the university library administrator (Groenewegen, 2015) alone directly addresses the discussion points raised in the original debate. As researchers in the field of scholarly communications, while this was not how we originally envisione d the debate, the rebuttals as a body of work have opened up some interesting themes, which we explore in addition to responding to the individual rebuttals. © 2015 by the Association for Information Systems.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 394
相关论文
共 50 条