Analysis of nanobubble collapse process by molecular simulation method

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Xue-Song [1 ]
Fan, Zhen-Zhong [1 ]
Tong, Qi-Lei [1 ]
Fu, Yuan-Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Petr Univ, Key Lab Enhanced Oil & Gas Recovery, Minist Educ, Daqing 163318, Peoples R China
关键词
nanobubble; molecular dynamics simulations; bubble collapse; water hammer effect; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.7498/aps.73.20241105
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
This study employs molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the process of nanobubble gradual indentation and eventual collapse. The research primarily focuses on the mechanisms by which impact velocity and bubble size influence the dynamic characteristics of nanobubble collapse. The results indicate that nanobubble collapse generally proceeds through three stages. Initially, there is a compression phase of water molecules surrounding the bubble, followed by a phase where the shock wave disrupts the stable structure of the liquid film, and finally, the complete collapse of the bubble. At higher impact velocities, smaller bubbles collapse more rapidly due to stronger shock effects. Post-collapse, a high-speed jet forms a protrusion on the right end of the velocity contour. The degree of protrusion increases with bubble size and impact velocity. Water molecules converge towards the bubble center, forming vortex structures above and below the bubble, effectively enhancing internal mass transfer. As bubble size and impact velocity increase, the density around the bubble gradually rises, reaching approximately 1.5 g/cm3 in localized areas upon complete collapse. When the bubble system decays to half its original size, a water hammer effect occurs. This effect becomes more pronounced with increasing bubble size and impact velocity. For a nanobubble structure with u p = 3.0 km/s and D = 10 nm, the local pressure formed by the water hammer impact of the jet after collapse can reach 30 GPa.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simulation of plasma doping process by using the localized molecular dynamics method
    Ji Hui-Hui
    Yu Min
    Ren Li-Ming
    Zhang Xing
    Huang Ru
    Zhang You-Guang
    CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2008, 17 (09) : 3428 - 3432
  • [32] Analysis of dissociation process for gas hydrates by molecular dynamics simulation
    Iwai, Yoshio
    Nakamura, Hiroki
    Arai, Yuki
    Shimoyama, Yusuke
    MOLECULAR SIMULATION, 2010, 36 (03) : 246 - 253
  • [33] Discontinuous molecular dynamics simulation study of polymer collapse
    Opps, Sheldon B.
    Polson, James M.
    Abou Risk, Nick
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 125 (19):
  • [34] Molecular dynamics simulation of the collapse of a single polymer chain
    Michel, A
    Kreitmeier, S
    COMPUTATIONAL AND THEORETICAL POLYMER SCIENCE, 1997, 7 (02): : 113 - 120
  • [35] Impact of Shock-Induced Lipid Nanobubble Collapse on a Phospholipid Membrane
    Sun, Dandan
    Lin, Xubo
    Zhang, Zuoheng
    Gu, Ning
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C, 2016, 120 (33): : 18803 - 18810
  • [36] Molecular dynamics simulations of a nanobubble's collapse-induced erosion on nickel boundary and porous nickel foam boundary
    Rezaee, Sasan
    Kadivar, Ebrahim
    el Moctar, Ould
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS, 2024, 397
  • [37] Large-scale molecular-dynamics simulation of nanoscale hydrophobic interaction and nanobubble formation
    Koishi, T
    Yasuoka, K
    Ebisuzaki, T
    Yoo, S
    Zeng, XC
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 123 (20):
  • [38] Mechanochemistry of shock-induced nanobubble collapse near silica in water
    Nomura, K.
    Kalia, R. K.
    Nakano, A.
    Vashishta, P.
    van Duin, A. C. T.
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2012, 101 (07)
  • [39] Drag reduction by nanobubble clusters as affected by surface wettability and flow velocity: Molecular dynamics simulation
    Lu, Yan
    TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 137 : 267 - 273
  • [40] Shock-induced collapse of a vapor nanobubble near solid boundaries
    Magaletti, Francesco
    Gallo, Mirko
    Marino, Luca
    Casciola, Carlo Massimo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2016, 84 : 34 - 45