Machine learning (ML) algorithms for seismic vulnerability assessment of school buildings in high-intensity seismic zones

被引:1
|
作者
Zain, Muhammad [1 ]
Dackermann, Ulrike [2 ]
Prasittisopin, Lapyote [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Architecture, Ctr Excellent Green Tech Architecture, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Adv Railway Infrastruct Innovat & Syst Engn Res Un, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
关键词
Machine learning; Seismic vulnerability assessment; Seismic analysis; Schools; Earthquakes; DAMAGE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107639
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Ensuring seismic resilience of school buildings is crucial for safeguarding their occupants during earthquakes. This paper focuses on assessing the seismic vulnerability of school buildings constructed in the Kashmir region of Pakistan after the 2005 earthquake, which claimed the lives of 19,000 school-going children. It explores the feasibility of utilizing machine learning (ML) algorithms for enhanced rapid screening of schools to establish fragility information. The study is based on data collected in the Kashmir region and focuses on assessing representative reinforced concrete (RC) and unreinforced masonry (URM) school buildings. To determine structural fragility curves, Incremental Dynamic Analyses (IDA) are performed, simulating fifteen historical earthquakes. Four different ML models are investigated to predict fragility curves, including Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Extremely Randomized Tree Regressor (ERTR). The performance of the algorithms is compared using performance metrics such as precision, accuracy, and f1 score. The study identified XGBoost and RF as the highest performing algorithms, achieving highly satisfactory accuracy with the correlation coefficients of 0.91 and 0.81 for RC schools, and 0.88 and 0.83 for URM schools during testing phases. Alternatively, ERTR's performance could not justify its use for structural seismic vulnerability assessments. This highlights the significant potential of using ML algorithms for automated seismic vulnerability evaluation of buildings, greatly reducing the overall computational burden while maintaining high accuracy and reliability.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reducing the Seismic Vulnerability of Existing Buildings: Assessment and Retrofit
    Ferreira, Tiago Miguel
    Mendes, Nuno
    Silva, Rui
    BUILDINGS, 2019, 9 (06)
  • [42] Buildings’ seismic vulnerability assessment methods: a comparative study
    N. Alam
    M. Shahria Alam
    S. Tesfamariam
    Natural Hazards, 2012, 62 : 405 - 424
  • [43] Seismic vulnerability assessment of confined masonry wall buildings
    Ranjbaran, Fariman
    Hosseini, Mahmood
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2014, 7 (02) : 201 - 216
  • [44] A Machine Learning Approach for Seismic Vulnerability Ranking
    Karampinis, Ioannis
    Iliadis, Lazaros
    24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF NEURAL NETWORKS, EAAAI/EANN 2023, 2023, 1826 : 3 - 16
  • [45] Qualitative evaluation of the seismic vulnerability of school buildings in Merida city
    Suarez, Luis
    Davila, Nazario
    Inglessis, Pether
    Rivero, Pedro
    CIENCIA E INGENIERIA, 2009, 30 (03): : 269 - 278
  • [46] Harnessing ML and GIS for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Risk Prioritization
    Shalu
    Acharya, Twinkle
    Gharekhan, Dhwanilnath
    Samal, Anddipak
    REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE GEOMATIQUE, 2024, 33 : 111 - 134
  • [47] Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings according to the 2007 and 2018 Turkish seismic codes
    Yon, Burak
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2020, 18 (06) : 709 - 718
  • [48] Assessment of the vulnerability of regional buildings considering low-temperature fields and seismic intensity measures
    Li, Si-Qi
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2024, 21
  • [49] Seismic vulnerability analysis of shield tunnel based on random IDA and machine learning algorithms
    Liu P.
    Ding Z.
    Zi H.
    Chen Y.
    Liu Z.
    Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2023, 20 (12) : 4848 - 4860
  • [50] Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping for 9.12 Gyeongju Earthquake Based on Machine Learning
    Han, Jihye
    Kim, Jinsoo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 36 (06) : 1367 - 1377