Multi-objective optimization of structural parameters of SCR system under Eley-Rideal reaction mechanism based on machine learning coupled with response surface methodology

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Zhiqing [1 ]
Zhong, Weihuang [1 ]
Pan, Mingzhang [2 ]
Yin, Zibin [3 ]
Lu, Kai [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech & Automot Engn, Liuzhou 545006, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Univ, Coll Mech Engn, Nanning 530004, Peoples R China
[3] Jimei Univ, Sch Marine Engn, Xiamen 361021, Peoples R China
关键词
Selective catalytic reduction; Predictive model; Machine learning; Multi-objective optimization; PERFORMANCE; PYROLYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuproc.2024.108141
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is an important method to control nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from diesel engines. Excellent SCR structural parameters are the key to effectively reduce NOx and back pressure. The dynamic reaction processes of NOx standard reaction, fast reaction and NO2-SCR reaction are deeply explored by establishing the Eley-Rideal model. The results show that the wall thickness and washcoat thickness of the SCR are the main determinants of the catalyst performance, while the CPSI has a great influence on the pressure drop. In addition, regression prediction analysis of experimental data by random forest (RF), particle swarm optimized backpropagation artificial neural network (PSOBP-ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) was performed to explore the coupling relation functions of structural parameters, and optimal test results were solved and verified. The denitrification efficiency of the structure-optimized SCR system increased by 22 % and the pressure drop decreased by 23 %.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-objective Optimization of Continuous Drive Friction Welding Process Parameters Using Response Surface Methodology with Intelligent Optimization Algorithm
    Ajith, P. M.
    Husain, T. M. Afsal
    Sathiya, P.
    Aravindan, S.
    JOURNAL OF IRON AND STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 22 (10) : 954 - 960
  • [32] Multi-objective Optimization of Continuous Drive Friction Welding Process Parameters Using Response Surface Methodology with Intelligent Optimization Algorithm
    P.M.AJITH
    T.M.AFSAL HUSAIN
    P.SATHIYA
    S.ARAVINDAN
    JournalofIronandSteelResearch(International), 2015, 22 (10) : 954 - 960
  • [33] Multi-objective Optimization of Continuous Drive Friction Welding Process Parameters Using Response Surface Methodology with Intelligent Optimization Algorithm
    P. M. Ajith
    T. M. Afsal Husain
    P. Sathiya
    S. Aravindan
    Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 2015, 22 : 954 - 960
  • [34] A wind speed interval prediction system based on multi-objective optimization for machine learning method
    Li, Ranran
    Jin, Yu
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 228 : 2207 - 2220
  • [36] Multi-objective optimization of a novel gas-liquid cylindrical cyclone based on response surface methodology
    Wang, Siqi
    Jiang, Minghu
    Zhang, Shuang
    Yu, Shiqi
    Lu, Mengmei
    Zhao, Lixin
    Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2024, 212 : 1 - 13
  • [37] Multi-objective optimization of wear performance of epoxy composites by gray-based response surface methodology
    Dharmalingam, Satish Kumar
    Murugesan, Rajmohan
    POLYMER COMPOSITES, 2021, 42 (08) : 3716 - 3721
  • [38] Response surface methodology for multi-objective optimization of fly ash-GGBS based geopolymer mortar
    Shi, Xiaoshuang
    Zhang, Cong
    Wang, Xiaoqi
    Zhang, Tao
    Wang, Qingyuan
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2022, 315
  • [39] Multi-Objective Optimization of TMD for Frame Structure Based on Response Surface Methodology and Weighted Desirability Function
    Islam, Mohammad Saiful
    Do, Jeongyun
    Kim, Dookie
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 22 (08) : 3015 - 3027
  • [40] Multi-Objective Optimization of TMD for Frame Structure Based on Response Surface Methodology and Weighted Desirability Function
    Mohammad Saiful Islam
    Jeongyun Do
    Dookie Kim
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22 : 3015 - 3027