Comparison of deep learning models and a typical process-based model in glacio-hydrology simulation

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Xi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Sheng [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Hongkai [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Jiaxu [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Chaopeng [4 ]
Li, Qingli [3 ]
Qi, Honggang [5 ]
Zheng, Laiwen [6 ]
Liu, Min [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science (Ministry of Education of China), East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
[2] School of Geographical Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
[3] Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
[4] Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA,16802, United States
[5] School of Computer Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
[6] Henan Key Laboratory of Smart Lighting, Huanghuai University, Zhumadian, Henan, China
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Glacier hydrology has profound implications for socio-economic development and nature conservation in arid Central Asia. Process-based hydrological models, which are the traditional tools used to simulate glacier melting, have made considerable contributions to advance our understanding of glacio-hydrology. Simultaneously, deep learning (DL) models have achieved excellent performance in many complex tasks and provide high accuracy. However, it is uncertain whether glacio-hydrological studies can benefit from the application of DL models. In this study, to help us assess water resource change for glacier-influenced regions, we used DL models to simulate glacio-hydrological processes in the Urumqi Glacier No. 1 in northwest China. First, we proposed a newly DL model called Exogenous Regularization Network (ERNet), which focuses on the relationship between exogenous (temperature and precipitation) and endogenous (runoff) variables, balancing the roles of different variables in the simulation process. Second, we compared ERNet with a stacked long short-term memory (LSTM) model and a process-based glacio-hydrology model, FLEXG. Experiments showed that compared with the other two models, ERNet not only performed well in runoff and peak flow simulations but also displayed superior transferability. Third, given that the DL model is data-driven, we experimentally compared the importance of air temperature and precipitation to glacial runoff processes. The results show that air temperature plays a dominant role in glacier runoff generation. We believe that the proposed model provides a useful predictive tool and that the results shed light on the future implication in cold region hydrology. © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predicting rice blast disease: machine learning versus process-based models
    David F. Nettleton
    Dimitrios Katsantonis
    Argyris Kalaitzidis
    Natasa Sarafijanovic-Djukic
    Pau Puigdollers
    Roberto Confalonieri
    BMC Bioinformatics, 20
  • [42] Gaussian Process-Based Learning Model Predictive Control With Application to USV
    Li, Fei
    Li, Huiping
    Wu, Chao
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2024, 71 (12) : 16388 - 16397
  • [43] Learning stochastic process-based models of dynamical systems from knowledge and data
    Tanevski, Jovan
    Todorovski, Ljupco
    Dzeroski, Saso
    BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2016, 10
  • [44] Predicting rice blast disease: machine learning versus process-based models
    Nettleton, David F.
    Katsantonis, Dimitrios
    Kalaitzidis, Argyris
    Sarafijanovic-Djukic, Natasa
    Puigdollers, Pau
    Confalonieri, Roberto
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [45] Enhancing the streamflow simulation of a process-based hydrological model using machine learning and multi-source data
    Lei, Huajin
    Li, Hongyi
    Hu, Wanpin
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 82
  • [46] Deep deconstruction and future development of process-based models for subsurface flow constructed wetlands
    Li, Yan
    Yuan, Linjiang
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2023, 56
  • [47] Predicting spatial and temporal variability in crop yields: an inter-comparison of machine learning, regression and process-based models
    Leng, Guoyong
    Hall, Jim W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (04)
  • [48] Reuse of process-based models: automatic transformation into many programming languages and simulation platforms
    Midingoyi, Cyrille Ahmed
    Pradal, Christophe
    Athanasiadis, Ioannis N.
    Donatelli, Marcello
    Enders, Andreas
    Fumagalli, Davide
    Garcia, Frederick
    Holzworth, Dean
    Hoogenboom, Gerrit
    Porter, Cheryl
    Raynal, Helene
    Thorburn, Peter
    Martre, Pierre
    IN SILICO PLANTS, 2020, 2 (01):
  • [49] Process-Based Vegetation Models Improve Karst Recharge Simulation Under Mediterranean Forest
    Carriere, Simon Damien
    Danquigny, Charles
    Davi, Hendrik
    Chalikakis, Konstantinos
    Ollivier, Chloe
    Martin-StPaul, Nicolas K.
    Emblanch, Christophe
    EUROKARST 2016, NEUCHATEL: ADVANCES IN THE HYDROGEOLOGY OF KARST AND CARBONATE RESERVOIRS, 2017, : 109 - 116
  • [50] Modular Compositional Learning Improves 1D Hydrodynamic Lake Model Performance by Merging Process-Based Modeling With Deep Learning
    Ladwig, R.
    Daw, A.
    Albright, E. A.
    Buelo, C.
    Karpatne, A.
    Meyer, M. F.
    Neog, A.
    Hanson, P. C.
    Dugan, H. A.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2024, 16 (01)