A Hidden Markov Model-Based Network Security Posture Prediction Model

被引:0
|
作者
Yang X. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Tianshui Normal University, Gansu, Tianshui
来源
关键词
Baum-Welch algorithm; Cybersecurity; Hidden Markov; Posture prediction model; Simulated annealing algorithm;
D O I
10.2478/amns.2023.2.00067
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As a key technology of network security situational awareness, this paper focuses on network security situational prediction technology and proposes a new network security situational prediction model based on Hidden Markov Model. The paper proposes a network security posture prediction method based on the improved Hidden Markov Model for the problem that the Baum-Welch parameter training method of the traditional Hidden Markov Model for posture prediction is sensitive to initial values and easily falls into local optimum. The method obtains the initial parameters by introducing the simulated annealing algorithm and using its excellent probabilistic burst-jump property to find the optimal in the global range. The Baum-Welch algorithm is used to optimize the initial parameters further to obtain the optimal model parameters, and then a more accurate posture prediction model is established. The probability of occurrence of the alarm information sequence corresponding to the network security posture value of 3 at t= 4 is obtained by simulating the network environment for testing, which is 0.000268, 0.000152, 0.000147, 0.000284, and 0.000187. Comparing the generated network security posture values with the real situation, it is found that the predicted results in this paper are highly similar to the real values. It is verified that the improved Hidden Markov method can effectively improve the accuracy of the network security posture prediction model and reflect the network security situation more objectively and realistically. © 2023 Xiaoping Yang, published by Sciendo.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Learning a Hidden Markov Model-Based Hyper-heuristic
    Van Onsem, Willem
    Demoen, Bart
    De Causmaecker, Patrick
    LEARNING AND INTELLIGENT OPTIMIZATION, LION 9, 2015, 8994 : 74 - 88
  • [32] Periodic hidden Markov model-based workload clustering and characterization
    Li, Ning
    Yu, Shun-Zheng
    2008 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 378 - 383
  • [33] A Hidden Markov Model-based Blind Detector for Multiplicative Watermarking
    Amini, Marzieh
    Sadreazami, Hamidreza
    Ahmad, M. Omair
    Swamy, M. N. S.
    2017 IEEE 60TH INTERNATIONAL MIDWEST SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (MWSCAS), 2017, : 611 - 614
  • [34] Hidden Markov model-based approach for multimode process monitoring
    Wang, Fan
    Tan, Shuai
    Shi, Hongbo
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2015, 148 : 51 - 59
  • [35] A hidden Markov model-based assembly contact recognition system
    Lau, HYK
    MECHATRONICS, 2003, 13 (8-9) : 1001 - 1023
  • [36] Hidden Markov model-based tool wear monitoring in turning
    Wang, LT
    Mehrabi, MG
    Kannatey-Asibu, E
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2002, 124 (03): : 651 - 658
  • [37] Hidden Markov model-based prediction of antigenic peptides that interact with MHC class II molecules
    Noguchi, H
    Kato, R
    Hanai, T
    Matsubara, Y
    Honda, H
    Brusic, V
    Kobayashi, T
    JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING, 2002, 94 (03) : 264 - 270
  • [38] A hidden Markov model for earthquake prediction
    Cheuk Fung Yip
    Wai Leong Ng
    Chun Yip Yau
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2018, 32 : 1415 - 1434
  • [39] Hidden Markov Model-Based Dynamic Hard Shoulders Running Strategy in Hybrid Network Environments
    Yao, Jinqiang
    Qian, Yu
    Feng, Zhanyu
    Zhang, Jian
    Zhang, Hongbin
    Chen, Tianyi
    Meng, Shaoyin
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (08):
  • [40] A hidden Markov model for earthquake prediction
    Yip, Cheuk Fung
    Ng, Wai Leong
    Yau, Chun Yip
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2018, 32 (05) : 1415 - 1434