Electrochemical treatment for leachate membrane retentate: Performance comparison of electrochemical oxidation and electro-coagulation technology

被引:0
|
作者
Song, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Xu [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Qiaoyun [2 ]
Xu, Linghan [2 ]
Liu, Dan [1 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, NO.111, North Section 1, 2nd Ring Road, Chengdu,610031, China
[2] Sichuan Provincial Engineering Research Center of City Solid Waste Energy and Buliding Materials Conversion and Utilization Technology, Chengdu University, Chengdu, NO. 2025, Chengluo Road, Chengdu,610106, China
[3] Postdoctoral Research Station of Haitian Water Group CO., Ltd, AVIC International Exchange Center, North Section of Yizhou Avenue, Chengdu,610041, China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Coagulation - Organic carbon - Chemical oxygen demand - Electrooxidation - Nitrogen removal - Leachate treatment - Ammonia - Anodes - Nitrogen;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the widespread use of membrane in advanced treatment of leachate, China produces a large amount of leachate membrane retentate (LMR) (≈23.4 million tons) annually, which is usually treated by incineration or recirculation in engineering, but these technologies have many drawbacks. LMR is suitable for electrochemical treatment due to its high electrical conductivity. This study compared the performances of electrochemical oxidation (EO) and electro-coagulation (EC) technology on LMR treatment under different experimental conditions, including anode material, current density, initial pH and reaction time. We found that EO optimal conditions achieved 70.1%, 83.1%, 78.7%, 98.7%, and 69.7% removal of total organic carbon (TOC), UV absorption (at 254 nm), chromaticity, ammonia nitrogen (NH3–N), and total nitrogen (TN), respectively. Compared with EO, EC exhibited a similar removal ability for orgainics and better removals of chroma, but much less performance for removing nitrogen pollutants in the same reaction time, that is, removals of NH3–N and TN were only 31.5% and 36.2%, respectively. Meanwhile, EC showed much higher instantaneous current efficiency of COD than EO under its optimal reaction time (120 min). In addition, the UV–Vis spectra and 3D fluorescence spectra indicated that EO exhibited relatively outstanding performance in decomposing dissolved organic matter (DOM) with rather complicated structures than EC. Also, the flow field-flow fractionation technique demonstrated that EO preferentially destroy humic-like, large molecular weight DOM, and converting them to smaller molecules, which resulted in more volatile organic compounds in EO samples than EC samples. While EC had little selectivity in the removal of organics, except humic-like DOM with relative small molecular. These findings can provide a theoretical basis for the electrochemical treatment of LMR. © 2022
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment of landfill leachate by electrochemical oxidation and anaerobic process
    Li, Tinggang
    Li, Xiufen
    Chen, Jian
    Zhang, Guoping
    Wang, Hongchun
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2007, 79 (05) : 514 - 520
  • [22] Treatment of old landfill leachate by persulfate enhanced electro-coagulation system: Improving organic matters removal and precipitates settling performance
    Deng, Yang
    Chen, Nan
    Hu, Weiwu
    Wang, Haishuang
    Kuang, Peijing
    Chen, Fangxin
    Feng, Chuanping
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2021, 424
  • [23] Electrochemical dosing of iron and aluminum in continuous processes: A key step to explain electro-coagulation processes
    Jimenez, Carlos
    Saez, Cristina
    Martinez, Fabiola
    Canizares, Pablo
    Rodrigo, Manuel A.
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 98 : 102 - 108
  • [24] A Review of Electrochemical Treatment Processes of Leachate Membrane Concentrate
    Tang, Peixin
    Ren, Xu
    Pan, Zhicheng
    Shen, Meng
    Peng, Danni
    Liu, Yucheng
    Zhong, Yaping
    Peng, Yumei
    Peng, Xin
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2024, 235 (02):
  • [25] A Review of Electrochemical Treatment Processes of Leachate Membrane Concentrate
    Peixin Tang
    Xu Ren
    Zhicheng Pan
    Meng Shen
    Danni Peng
    Yucheng Liu
    Yaping Zhong
    Yumei Peng
    Xin Peng
    Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2024, 235
  • [26] A comparative treatment of stabilized landfill leachate: Coagulation and activated carbon adsorption vs. electrochemical oxidation
    Papastavrou, Chrystalla
    Mantzavinos, Dionissios
    Diamadopoulos, Evan
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 30 (14) : 1547 - 1553
  • [27] In situ coagulation-electrochemical oxidation of leachate concentrate: A key role of cathodes
    Li, Huankai
    Zeng, Qian
    Zan, Feixiang
    Lin, Sen
    Hao, Tianwei
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ECOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 16
  • [28] Comprehensive analysis of the integrated electro-coagulation and membrane filtration process for semiconductor wastewater treatment
    Lee, Jihyeon
    Lee, Yoojin
    Kim, Soyoun
    So, Yeon
    Yoon, Yeomin
    Park, Chanhyuk
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2023, 56
  • [29] Electro-coagulation treatment of raw and autoclaved landfill leachate with aluminum electrodes: case study of Djebel Chakir (Tunisia)
    Kallel, Amjad
    Attour, Anis
    Trabelsi, Ismail
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 10 (04)
  • [30] Application of Sequential Combination of Electro-Coagulation/Electro-Oxidation and Adsorption for the Treatment of Hemodialysis Wastewater for Possible Reuse
    Jallouli, Sameh
    Chouchene, Khawla
    Ben Hmida, Mohamed
    Ksibi, Mohamed
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (15)