Electrochemical treatment for leachate membrane retentate: Performance comparison of electrochemical oxidation and electro-coagulation technology

被引:0
|
作者
Song, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Xu [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Qiaoyun [2 ]
Xu, Linghan [2 ]
Liu, Dan [1 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, NO.111, North Section 1, 2nd Ring Road, Chengdu,610031, China
[2] Sichuan Provincial Engineering Research Center of City Solid Waste Energy and Buliding Materials Conversion and Utilization Technology, Chengdu University, Chengdu, NO. 2025, Chengluo Road, Chengdu,610106, China
[3] Postdoctoral Research Station of Haitian Water Group CO., Ltd, AVIC International Exchange Center, North Section of Yizhou Avenue, Chengdu,610041, China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Coagulation - Organic carbon - Chemical oxygen demand - Electrooxidation - Nitrogen removal - Leachate treatment - Ammonia - Anodes - Nitrogen;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the widespread use of membrane in advanced treatment of leachate, China produces a large amount of leachate membrane retentate (LMR) (≈23.4 million tons) annually, which is usually treated by incineration or recirculation in engineering, but these technologies have many drawbacks. LMR is suitable for electrochemical treatment due to its high electrical conductivity. This study compared the performances of electrochemical oxidation (EO) and electro-coagulation (EC) technology on LMR treatment under different experimental conditions, including anode material, current density, initial pH and reaction time. We found that EO optimal conditions achieved 70.1%, 83.1%, 78.7%, 98.7%, and 69.7% removal of total organic carbon (TOC), UV absorption (at 254 nm), chromaticity, ammonia nitrogen (NH3–N), and total nitrogen (TN), respectively. Compared with EO, EC exhibited a similar removal ability for orgainics and better removals of chroma, but much less performance for removing nitrogen pollutants in the same reaction time, that is, removals of NH3–N and TN were only 31.5% and 36.2%, respectively. Meanwhile, EC showed much higher instantaneous current efficiency of COD than EO under its optimal reaction time (120 min). In addition, the UV–Vis spectra and 3D fluorescence spectra indicated that EO exhibited relatively outstanding performance in decomposing dissolved organic matter (DOM) with rather complicated structures than EC. Also, the flow field-flow fractionation technique demonstrated that EO preferentially destroy humic-like, large molecular weight DOM, and converting them to smaller molecules, which resulted in more volatile organic compounds in EO samples than EC samples. While EC had little selectivity in the removal of organics, except humic-like DOM with relative small molecular. These findings can provide a theoretical basis for the electrochemical treatment of LMR. © 2022
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electrochemical treatment for leachate membrane retentate: Performance comparison of electrochemical oxidation and electro-coagulation technology
    Song, Kai
    Ren, Xu
    Zhang, Qiaoyun
    Xu, Linghan
    Liu, Dan
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 303
  • [2] Tertiary treatment of landfill leachate by an integrated Electro-Oxidation/Electro-Coagulation/Electro-Reduction process: Performance and mechanism
    Ding, Jing
    Wei, Liangliang
    Huang, Huibin
    Zhao, Qingliang
    Hou, Weizhu
    Kabutey, Felix Tetteh
    Yuan, Yixing
    Dionysiou, Dionysios D.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2018, 351 : 90 - 97
  • [3] Combination of Electro-Coagulation and biological treatment by bioaugmentation for landfill leachate
    Djelal, H.
    Lelievre, Y.
    Ricordel, C.
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2015, 54 (11) : 2986 - 2993
  • [4] Comparison of electro-oxidation (BDD anode and Ti/Pt cathode) and electro-coagulation (aluminum electrodes) for the treatment of raw landfill leachate
    Marmanis, D.
    Diamantis, V
    Thysiadou, A.
    Kokkinos, N.
    Christoforidis, A.
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2022, 260 : 203 - 208
  • [5] Efficient treatment of old landfill leachate by peroxodisulfate assisted electro-oxidation and electro-coagulation combined system
    Ma D.
    Wang D.
    Wang X.
    Wang Q.
    Hu Y.
    Chemosphere, 2024, 346
  • [6] Landfill Leachate Treatment by Combining Coagulation and Advanced Electrochemical Oxidation Techniques
    de Oliveira, Mayra S.
    da Silva, Larissa F.
    Barbosa, Andreia D.
    Romualdo, Lincoln L.
    Sadoyama, Geraldo
    Andrade, Leonardo S.
    CHEMELECTROCHEM, 2019, 6 (05) : 1427 - 1433
  • [7] Treatment of municipal solid wastes leachate by means of chemical- and electro-coagulation
    Veli, Sevil
    Oeztuerk, Tuba
    Dimoglo, Anatoly
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 61 (01) : 82 - 88
  • [8] Treatment performance evaluation of chemical oxygen demand from landfill leachate by electro-coagulation and electro-fenton technique
    Orkun, Merve Oya
    Kuleyin, Ayse
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2012, 31 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [9] Landfill leachate treatment by electrochemical oxidation
    Bashir, Mohammed J. K.
    Isa, Mohamed Hasnain
    Kutty, Shamsul Rahman Mohamed
    Bin Awang, Zarizi
    Aziz, Hamidi Abdul
    Mohajeri, Soraya
    Farooqi, Izharul Haq
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (09) : 2534 - 2541
  • [10] Electrochemical oxidation for landfill leachate treatment
    Deng, Yang
    Englehardt, James D.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (03) : 380 - 388