A novel validity index in fuzzy clustering algorithm

被引:0
|
作者
Feng Z. [1 ,2 ]
Fan J.-C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Provincial Key Lab for Information Technology of Wisdom Mining of Shandong Province, Qingdao
[2] College of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao
来源
Fan, Jian-Cong (fanjiancong@sdust.edu.cn) | 1600年 / Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., 29, route de Pre-Bois, Case Postale 856, CH-1215 Geneva 15, CH-1215, Switzerland卷 / 10期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fuzzy c-means algorithm; Fuzzy clustering; Optimal number of clusters; Validity index;
D O I
10.1504/IJWMC.2016.076153
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Fuzzy clustering algorithms, especially the fuzzy c-means (FCM) algorithm, need the number of clusters specified manually in advance, which, to some extent, limits the application of FCM algorithm. To solve this problem of fuzzy clustering algorithm not being able to predict the number of clusters, this paper proposes a new cluster validity index. This algorithm produces membership matrix and cluster centroid by implementing the FCM algorithm iteratively, figuring out the corresponding inter-class degree of separation, intra-class compactness and inter-class degree of overlap. A new cluster validity index voscar is defined by using the three indices. This new index solves the problem that FCM algorithm needs to preset a number of clusters, as well as avoiding the low accuracy of fuzzy degree introduced in the calculation of distance due to uneven distribution of data, particularly in the presence of intra-class overlap. The experiments conducted on artificial data sets and the actual data sets show that the proposed index can make correct evaluations of the fuzzy clustering results, and can automatically obtain the optimal number of clusters so as to improve the effect of clustering. Meanwhile it also shows that this index possesses excellent reliability for different fuzzy factors. © 2016 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 190
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Probabilistic Cluster Validity Index for Agglomerative Bayesian Fuzzy Clustering
    Lee, Sang Wan
    Kim, Yong Soo
    Bien, Zeungnam
    2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FOR MODELLING CONTROL & AUTOMATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 368 - +
  • [32] A Fuzzy Clustering Validity Index Induced by Triple Center Relation
    Tang, Yiming
    Huang, Jiajia
    Pedrycz, Witold
    Li, Bing
    Ren, Fuji
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2023, 53 (08) : 5024 - 5036
  • [33] A fuzzy cluster validity index based on clustering mistake measures
    Ben, Sheng-Lan
    Su, Guang-Da
    Moshi Shibie yu Rengong Zhineng/Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2010, 23 (01): : 11 - 16
  • [34] Clustering Validity Evaluation Functions of Fuzzy C-means Clustering Algorithm
    Wang, Guan
    Xing, Cheng
    Wang, Jie-Sheng
    Wang, Hong-Yu
    Liu, Jia-Xu
    IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, 2022, 49 (02):
  • [35] A Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm Based on Weighted Index and Optimization of Clustering Number
    Wang, Wen-qi
    Li, Qiang
    FOUNDATIONS OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (ISKE 2013), 2014, 277 : 349 - 359
  • [36] A New Validity Index Based on Fuzzy Energy and Fuzzy Entropy Measures in Fuzzy Clustering Problems
    Di Martino, Ferdinando
    Sessa, Salvatore
    ENTROPY, 2020, 22 (11) : 1 - 14
  • [37] A New Fuzzy Clustering Validity Index With a Median Factor for Centroid-Based Clustering
    Wu, Chih-Hung
    Ouyang, Chen-Sen
    Chen, Li-Wen
    Lu, Li-Wei
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2015, 23 (03) : 701 - 718
  • [38] Novel Cluster Validity Index for FCM Algorithm
    Jian Yu
    Cui-Xia Li
    Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2006, 21 : 137 - 140
  • [39] Novel cluster validity index for FCM algorithm
    Yu, J
    Li, CX
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 21 (01) : 137 - 140
  • [40] Novel Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm Based on Fireflies
    Dan, Li
    Ke, Luo
    Zhen, Sun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INNOVATION, 2015, 12 : 112 - 116