Filtration performance of biofilm membrane bioreactor: Fouling control by threshold flux operation

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang W. [1 ]
Liang W. [2 ]
Jin J. [3 ]
Meng S. [3 ]
He Z. [4 ]
Ali M. [5 ]
Saikaly P.E. [6 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Ecological Security and Green Development, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou
[2] State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Water Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China, Guangzhou
[3] School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing
[4] Key Laboratory of Electromechanical Equipment Safety in Western Complex Environment for State Market Regulation, Chongqing Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute, Chongqing
[5] Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin
[6] Environmental Science and Engineering Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE) Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biofilm membrane bioreactor; Filtration performance; Membrane fouling; Shear stress; Threshold flux;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142458
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Membrane fouling is the major factor that restricts the furtherly widespread use of membrane bioreactor (MBR). As a new generation of MBR, biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR) demonstrates high treatment efficiency and low sludge growth rate, however the filtration performance improvement and membrane fouling control are still the challenges for its further development. This work investigated the filtration performance using resistance in series model and membrane fouling control via threshold flux for BF-MBR. At first, the flux behavior and filtration resistance under various operating conditions, including agitation speed, membrane and TMP, were explored by resistance in series model. Because of the desirable anti-fouling capacity, UP100 and UP030 had the high threshold flux (100 and 90 L m−2 h−1) and low irreversible fouling resistance (1 and 1.3 × 10−10 m-1). Higher shear stress produced by higher agitation speed could reduce membrane fouling, while greatly promote the threshold flux (138 L m−2 h−1) and membrane cleaning efficiency (96%). Moreover, increasing shear stress or selecting membrane with large pore size could decrease the fouling rate and raise the threshold flux. As for TMP, high TMP reduced the removal rate for organic and nutrient, and enhanced the irreversible fouling. Besides, the aerobic-BF-MBR (101 L m−2 h−1 and 1.3 × 10−10 m-1) with lower foulant concentration had a better filtration performance than anoxic-BF-MBR (90 L m−2 h−1 and 1.5 × 10−10 m-1). Additionally, the long-term tests with 10 cycles were conducted to evaluate the industrial application value of BF-MBR (45–58 L m−2 h−1). This work provides the technical support for sustainable filtration performance of BF-MBR. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Changes in biofilm-architecture with addition of membrane fouling reducer in a membrane bioreactor
    Lee, Woo-Nyoung
    Chang, In-Soung
    Hwang, Byung-Kook
    Park, Pyung-Kyu
    Lee, Chung-Hak
    Huang, Xia
    PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2007, 42 (04) : 655 - 661
  • [22] Membrane fouling properties under different filtration modes in a submerged membrane bioreactor
    Wu, Zhichao
    Wang, Qiaoying
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Ma, Yanqiang
    Zhou, Qi
    Yang, Dianhai
    PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 45 (10) : 1699 - 1706
  • [23] Effects of filtration modes on membrane fouling behavior and treatment in submerged membrane bioreactor
    Maqbool, Tahir
    Khan, Sher Jamal
    Lee, Chung-Hak
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 172 : 391 - 395
  • [24] Membrane fouling and performance evaluation of conventional membrane bioreactor (MBR), moving biofilm MBR and oxic/anoxic MBR
    Khan, Sher Jamal
    Ahmad, Aman
    Nawaz, Muhammad Saqib
    Hankins, Nicholas P.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 69 (07) : 1403 - 1409
  • [25] Operation performance and membrane fouling of a spiral symmetry stream anaerobic membrane bioreactor supplemented with biogas aeration
    Chen Xiaoguang
    Li Gang
    Lin Haibo
    Li Yuling
    Ma Yanxue
    Dai Ruobin
    Zhang Jiqiang
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2017, 539 : 206 - 212
  • [26] COMPARISON BETWEEN A MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR, A HYBRID MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR-MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR AND A PURE MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR-MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR ON MEMBRANE FOULING
    Leyva-Diaz, J. C.
    Martin-Pascual, J.
    Fenice, M.
    Munio, M. M.
    Poyatos, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2015, 16 (04): : 1502 - 1508
  • [27] Development of artificial intelligence-based models for the prediction of filtration performance and membrane fouling in an osmotic membrane bioreactor
    Nguyen Duc Viet
    Jang, Am
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (04):
  • [28] Optimal Scheduling and Fouling Control in Membrane Bioreactor
    Kalboussi, N.
    Harmand, J.
    Ellouze, F.
    Ben Amar, N.
    FRONTIERS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND MODELLING, FICWTM 2017, 2017, 4 : 239 - 244
  • [29] Fouling control of a metal membrane bioreactor with ozone
    Xie, Yuanhua
    Yuan, Chunli
    Lv, Liting
    Chai, Tianyu
    Bai, Bing
    Fan, Mingxiang
    You, Meiyan
    Han, Jin
    Zhu, Tong
    Energy Education Science and Technology Part A: Energy Science and Research, 2014, 32 (01): : 615 - 624
  • [30] Long term operation performance and membrane fouling mechanisms of anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating waste activated sludge at high solid concentration and high flux
    Guo, Guangze
    Li, Yemei
    Zhou, Shitong
    Chen, Yujie
    Urasaki, Kampachiro
    Qin, Yu
    Kubota, Kengo
    Li, Yu -You
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 846