IMPACT OF CONTROLLED DRAINAGE ON CROP YIELD INCLUDING WITHIN-FIELD VARIABILITY

被引:1
|
作者
Baird A. [1 ]
Frankenberger J. [1 ]
Bowling L. [1 ]
Kladivko E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
来源
Journal of the ASABE | 2024年 / 67卷 / 03期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Controlled drainage; Crop yield; Drainage water management; Soil drainage class; Subsurface drainage;
D O I
10.13031/ja.15520
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Controlled drainage is the practice of using a water control structure to raise the outlet in agricultural fields during periods when drainage is unnecessary, with the primary purpose of reducing nitrate loss. The use of this practice may increase crop yields compared to free drainage because controlled drainage can capture water from precipitation as soil water and store it for crop use later in the growing season. However, results from published studies of controlled drainage have shown mixed impacts on crop yields, and the effects of field characteristics and annual weather variation on these impacts are not well understood. To analyze crop yield impacts, two controlled and two free draining plots in eastern Indiana were compared. A grid system consisting of 10 by 10 meter cells was created to obtain a balanced data set and used to analyze crop yield by year, annual wetness classification, soil drainage class, and elevation. Controlled drainage significantly increased the corn yield in six out of nine years, and the nine-year corn yield average increased by 2.3%. Soybean yield was significantly higher under controlled drainage in three out of four years, but there was no significant difference in the four-year soybean average. Years were further classified as wet, normal, or dry based on growing season precipitation, and results indicated controlled drainage had the greatest significant impact on corn yield in the dry years. Analyzing yield by soil drainage class determined that yield had the greatest response to controlled drainage on the very poorly drained soils. Controlled drainage had a significant yield benefit in corn during dry years in areas in which the elevation is more than 30 cm above the surface elevation at the outlet, and did not lead to significant differences in normal or wet years at any elevation. The grid-based analysis with a linear mixed model accounting for autocorrelation was useful for understanding within-field variability of yield response. © 2024 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 727
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Normalization of the crop water stress index to assess the within-field spatial variability of water stress sensitivity
    Victoria Gonzalez-Dugo
    Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada
    Diego S. Intrigliolo
    Juan-Miguel Ramírez-Cuesta
    Precision Agriculture, 2021, 22 : 964 - 983
  • [42] Downscaling the APSIM crop model for simulation at the within-field scale
    Pasquel, Daniel
    Cammarano, Davide
    Roux, Sebastien
    Castrignano, Annamaria
    Tisseyre, Bruno
    Rinaldi, Michele
    Troccoli, Antonio
    Taylor, James A.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 212
  • [43] Configurational crop heterogeneity increases within-field plant diversity
    Alignier, Audrey
    Sole-Senan, Xavier O.
    Robleno, Irene
    Baraibar, Barbara
    Fahrig, Lenore
    Giralt, David
    Gross, Nicolas
    Martin, Jean-Louis
    Recasens, Jordi
    Sirami, Clelia
    Siriwardena, Gavin
    Baillod, Aliette Bosem
    Bertrand, Colette
    Carrie, Romain
    Hass, Annika
    Henckel, Laura
    Miguet, Paul
    Badenhausser, Isabelle
    Baudry, Jacques
    Bota, Gerard
    Bretagnolle, Vincent
    Brotons, Lluis
    Burel, Francoise
    Calatayud, Francois
    Clough, Yann
    Georges, Romain
    Gibon, Annick
    Girard, Jude
    Lindsay, Kathryn
    Minano, Jesus
    Mitchell, Scott
    Patry, Nathalie
    Poulin, Brigitte
    Tscharntke, Teja
    Vialatte, Aude
    Violle, Cyrille
    Yaverscovski, Nicole
    Batary, Peter
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2020, 57 (04) : 654 - 663
  • [44] Information on within-field variability from sequences of yield maps: multivariate classification as a first step of interpretation
    Lark, RM
    Stafford, JV
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 1998, 50 (1-3) : 277 - 281
  • [45] Monitoring Within-Field Variability of Corn Yield using Sentinel-2 and Machine Learning Techniques
    Kayad, Ahmed
    Sozzi, Marco
    Gatto, Simone
    Marinello, Francesco
    Pirotti, Francesco
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (23)
  • [46] Information on within-field variability from sequences of yield maps: multivariate classification as a first step of interpretation
    R.M. Lark
    J.V. Stafford
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 1998, 50 : 277 - 281
  • [47] Multipolarized radar for delineating within-field variability in corn and wheat
    Smith, A. M.
    Eddy, P. R.
    Bugden-Storie, J.
    Pattey, E.
    McNairn, H.
    Nolin, M.
    Perron, I.
    Hinther, M.
    Miller, J.
    Haboudane, D.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 32 (04) : 300 - 313
  • [48] Geostatistical modelling of within-field soil and yield variability for management zones delineation: a case study in a durum wheat field
    G. Buttafuoco
    A. Castrignanò
    G. Cucci
    G. Lacolla
    F. Lucà
    Precision Agriculture, 2017, 18 : 37 - 58
  • [49] Geostatistical modelling of within-field soil and yield variability for management zones delineation: a case study in a durum wheat field
    Buttafuoco, G.
    Castrignano, A.
    Cucci, G.
    Lacolla, G.
    Luca, F.
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2017, 18 (01) : 37 - 58
  • [50] Modelling within-field spatial variability of crop biomass - weed density relationships using geographically weighted regression
    Blanco-Moreno, J. M.
    Chamorro, L.
    Izquierdo, J.
    Masalles, R. M.
    Sans, F. X.
    WEED RESEARCH, 2008, 48 (06) : 512 - 522