IMPACT OF CONTROLLED DRAINAGE ON CROP YIELD INCLUDING WITHIN-FIELD VARIABILITY

被引:1
|
作者
Baird A. [1 ]
Frankenberger J. [1 ]
Bowling L. [1 ]
Kladivko E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
来源
Journal of the ASABE | 2024年 / 67卷 / 03期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Controlled drainage; Crop yield; Drainage water management; Soil drainage class; Subsurface drainage;
D O I
10.13031/ja.15520
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Controlled drainage is the practice of using a water control structure to raise the outlet in agricultural fields during periods when drainage is unnecessary, with the primary purpose of reducing nitrate loss. The use of this practice may increase crop yields compared to free drainage because controlled drainage can capture water from precipitation as soil water and store it for crop use later in the growing season. However, results from published studies of controlled drainage have shown mixed impacts on crop yields, and the effects of field characteristics and annual weather variation on these impacts are not well understood. To analyze crop yield impacts, two controlled and two free draining plots in eastern Indiana were compared. A grid system consisting of 10 by 10 meter cells was created to obtain a balanced data set and used to analyze crop yield by year, annual wetness classification, soil drainage class, and elevation. Controlled drainage significantly increased the corn yield in six out of nine years, and the nine-year corn yield average increased by 2.3%. Soybean yield was significantly higher under controlled drainage in three out of four years, but there was no significant difference in the four-year soybean average. Years were further classified as wet, normal, or dry based on growing season precipitation, and results indicated controlled drainage had the greatest significant impact on corn yield in the dry years. Analyzing yield by soil drainage class determined that yield had the greatest response to controlled drainage on the very poorly drained soils. Controlled drainage had a significant yield benefit in corn during dry years in areas in which the elevation is more than 30 cm above the surface elevation at the outlet, and did not lead to significant differences in normal or wet years at any elevation. The grid-based analysis with a linear mixed model accounting for autocorrelation was useful for understanding within-field variability of yield response. © 2024 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 727
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting spatial patterns of within-field crop yield variability
    Maestrini, Bernardo
    Basso, Bruno
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2018, 219 : 106 - 112
  • [2] Drivers of within-field spatial and temporal variability of crop yield across the US Midwest
    Maestrini, Bernardo
    Basso, Bruno
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [3] Drivers of within-field spatial and temporal variability of crop yield across the US Midwest
    Bernardo Maestrini
    Bruno Basso
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [4] Early season prediction of within-field crop yield variability by assimilating CubeSat data into a crop model
    Ziliani, Matteo G.
    Altaf, Muhammad U.
    Aragon, Bruno
    Houborg, Rasmus
    Franz, Trenton E.
    Lu, Yang
    Sheffield, Justin
    Hoteit, Ibrahim
    McCabe, Matthew F.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2022, 313
  • [5] Using RapidEye imagery to identify within-field variability of crop growth and yield in Ontario, Canada
    Taifeng Dong
    Jiali Shang
    Jiangui Liu
    Budong Qian
    Qi Jing
    Baoluo Ma
    Ted Huffman
    Xiaoyuan Geng
    Abdoul Sow
    Yichao Shi
    Francis Canisius
    Xianfeng Jiao
    John M. Kovacs
    Dan Walters
    Jeff Cable
    Jeff Wilson
    Precision Agriculture, 2019, 20 : 1231 - 1250
  • [6] Using RapidEye imagery to identify within-field variability of crop growth and yield in Ontario, Canada
    Dong, Taifeng
    Shang, Jiali
    Liu, Jiangui
    Qian, Budong
    Jing, Qi
    Ma, Baoluo
    Huffman, Ted
    Geng, Xiaoyuan
    Sow, Abdoul
    Shi, Yichao
    Canisius, Francis
    Jiao, Xianfeng
    Kovacs, John M.
    Walters, Dan
    Cable, Jeff
    Wilson, Jeff
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2019, 20 (06) : 1231 - 1250
  • [7] Within-field variation of crop yield loss from cover crops
    Girz, Andrei I.
    Mattila, Tuomas J.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2024, 116 (06) : 2922 - 2933
  • [8] Impact of within-field variability in soil hydraulic properties on transpiration fluxes and crop yields: A numerical study
    Hupet, F
    van Dam, JC
    Vanclooster, M
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2004, 3 (04) : 1367 - 1379
  • [9] Investigating geostatistical methods to model within-field yield variability of cranberries
    Kerry, R.
    Goovaerts, P.
    Gimenez, D.
    Oudemans, P.
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE '13, 2013, : 305 - 311
  • [10] Calibration methodology for mapping within-field crop variability using remote sensing
    Wood, GA
    Taylor, JC
    Godwin, RJ
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2003, 84 (04) : 409 - 423